The effects of trade integration on formal and informal entrepreneurship: The moderating role of economic development

被引:3
作者
Elizabeth M Moore
Luis Alfonso Dau
Santiago Mingo
机构
[1] Northeastern University,
[2] Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez,undefined
来源
Journal of International Business Studies | 2021年 / 52卷
关键词
trade integration; entrepreneurship; economic development; new institutional economics; trade agreements; regression analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Does entrepreneurship in a country benefit from trade integration? Moreover, do all types of entrepreneurs respond the same way to this integration? Specifically focusing on formal and informal entrepreneurship, we analyze the effects of trade integration in the context of different levels of economic development. First, we propose that trade integration increases a country’s formal entrepreneurship while decreasing a country’s informal entrepreneurship. A key mechanism explains this relationship: trade agreements provide supranational institutional structures that encourage formal, and discourage informal, venture creation. We dig deeper into this issue by arguing that these effects are stronger in less developed countries than highly developed countries. Analyses using a panel of 68 countries spanning 11 years provide robust support for these assertions. While our findings are aligned with previous scholarship that describes the asymmetric benefits of trade agreements for member nations, we add refinement by teasing out where the impacts are strongest (e.g., for entrepreneurial formalization in less developed countries) and where the impacts are less pronounced (e.g., for entrepreneurial formalization in highest developed countries). Thus, as policy makers continue to face challenging questions related to trade relationships, these results prompt future scholarship to examine other such potential benefits and asymmetries.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 772
页数:26
相关论文
共 150 条
[1]  
Acs Z(2006)How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innovations: Technology Governance, Globalization 1 97-107
[2]  
Acs Z(2008)Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics in Latin America Small Business Economics 31 305-322
[3]  
Amorós J(2008)What does ‘entrepreneurship’ data really show? Small Business Economics 31 265-281
[4]  
Acs Z(2001)Entrepreneurship, globalization, and public policy Journal of International Management 7 235-251
[5]  
Desai S(1998)Openness, country size and the government Journal of Public Economics 69 305-321
[6]  
Klapper L(2013)Ten years of global entrepreneurship monitor: Accomplishments and prospects International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing 5 120-152
[7]  
Acs ZJ(2005)Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship Small Business Economics 24 233-247
[8]  
Morck RK(2005)The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980–1999 The American Journal of Political Science 49 625-641
[9]  
Yeung B(2008)Forecasting with panel data Journal of Forecasting 27 153-173
[10]  
Alesina A(1986)The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1173-1182