Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives

被引:0
|
作者
Nicolae Bolog
Daniel Nanz
Dominik Weishaupt
机构
[1] University Hospital,Institute of Diagnostic Radiology
来源
European Radiology | 2006年 / 16卷
关键词
MR imaging; 3 Tesla; Musculoskeletal imaging;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important diagnostic tool in evaluation of the musculoskeletal system. While most examinations are currently performed at magnetic field strengths of 1.5 T or lower, whole-body MR systems operating at 3.0 T have recently become available for clinical use. The higher field strengths promise various benefits, including increased signal-to-noise ratios, enhanced T2* contrast, increased chemical shift resolution, and most likely a better diagnostic performance in various applications. However, the changed T1, T2, and T2* relaxation times, the increased resonance-frequency differences caused by susceptibility and chemical-shift differences, and the increased absorption of radiofrequency (RF) energy by the tissues pose new challenges and/or offer new opportunities for imaging at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T. Some of these issues have been successfully addressed only in the very recent past. This review discusses technical aspects of 3.0 T imaging as far as they have an impact on clinical routine. An overview of the current data is presented, with a focus on areas where 3.0 T promises equivalent or improved performance compared 1.5 T or lower field strengths.
引用
收藏
页码:1298 / 1307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High-resolution MR imaging of the knee at 3 T
    Niitsu, M
    Nakai, T
    Ikeda, K
    Tang, GY
    Yoshioka, H
    Itai, Y
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2000, 41 (01) : 84 - 88
  • [32] Primary biliary cirrhosis: Evaluation with T2-weighted MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography
    Haliloglu, Nuray
    Erden, Ayse
    Erden, Ilhan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 69 (03) : 523 - 527
  • [33] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in musculoskeletal diseases: Current concepts
    Dallaudiere, B.
    Lecouvet, F.
    Berg, B. Vande
    Omoumi, P.
    Perlepe, V.
    Cerny, M.
    Malghem, J.
    Larbi, A.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2015, 96 (04) : 327 - 340
  • [34] Current Concepts of MR Imaging Anatomy and Pathology of the Rectus Femoris Complex
    Mecho, Sandra
    Isern-Kebschull, Jaime
    Kassarjian, Ara
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2025, 33 (01) : 95 - 114
  • [35] 3.0-T morphological and angiographic brain imaging: a 5-years experience
    Scarabino, T.
    Popolizio, T.
    Giannatempo, G. M.
    Nemore, F.
    Maiorana, A.
    Carriero, A.
    Messana, D.
    Maggialetti, A.
    Armillotta, M.
    Salvolini, U.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2007, 112 (01): : 82 - 96
  • [36] A dynamic approach for MR T2-weighted pelvic imaging
    Cheng, Jing
    Li, Qingneng
    Liu, Naijia
    Yang, Jun
    Fu, Yu
    Cui, Zhuo-Xu
    Wang, Zhenkui
    Li, Guobin
    Zhang, Huimao
    Liang, Dong
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (20):
  • [37] CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA IDENTIFICATION BY CT AND MR-IMAGING AT 1.5-T
    HALD, JK
    ELDEVIK, OP
    SKALPE, IO
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 1995, 36 (02) : 142 - 147
  • [38] Biliary complications after liver transplantation: Assessment with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging at 3T device
    Boraschi, Piero
    Donati, Francescamaria
    Pacciardi, Federica
    Ghinolfi, Davide
    Falaschi, Fabio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 106 : 46 - 55
  • [39] MR IMAGING OF HAND AND WRIST WITH A DEDICATED 0.1-T LOW-FIELD IMAGING-SYSTEM
    GRIES, P
    CONSTANTINESCO, A
    BRUNOT, B
    FACELLO, A
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1991, 9 (06) : 949 - 953
  • [40] MR Diagnosis of Bone Metastases at 1.5T and 3T: Can STIR Imaging Be Omitted?
    Ohlmann-Knafo, S.
    Tarnoki, A. D.
    Tarnoki, D. L.
    Pickuth, D.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2015, 187 (10): : 924 - 932