Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives

被引:0
|
作者
Nicolae Bolog
Daniel Nanz
Dominik Weishaupt
机构
[1] University Hospital,Institute of Diagnostic Radiology
来源
European Radiology | 2006年 / 16卷
关键词
MR imaging; 3 Tesla; Musculoskeletal imaging;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important diagnostic tool in evaluation of the musculoskeletal system. While most examinations are currently performed at magnetic field strengths of 1.5 T or lower, whole-body MR systems operating at 3.0 T have recently become available for clinical use. The higher field strengths promise various benefits, including increased signal-to-noise ratios, enhanced T2* contrast, increased chemical shift resolution, and most likely a better diagnostic performance in various applications. However, the changed T1, T2, and T2* relaxation times, the increased resonance-frequency differences caused by susceptibility and chemical-shift differences, and the increased absorption of radiofrequency (RF) energy by the tissues pose new challenges and/or offer new opportunities for imaging at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T. Some of these issues have been successfully addressed only in the very recent past. This review discusses technical aspects of 3.0 T imaging as far as they have an impact on clinical routine. An overview of the current data is presented, with a focus on areas where 3.0 T promises equivalent or improved performance compared 1.5 T or lower field strengths.
引用
收藏
页码:1298 / 1307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic accuracy of DW MR imaging in the differentiation of chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: A 3.0-T MRI study of 105 cases
    Welzel, Thomas
    Meyerhof, Eva
    Uhl, Matthias
    Huang, Kristin
    von Deimling, Andreas
    Herfarth, Klaus
    Debus, Juergen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 105 : 119 - 124
  • [22] Cardiac MR tagging: Optimization of sequence parameters and comparison at 1.5 T and 3.0 T in a volunteer study
    Kramer, U
    Deshpande, V
    Fenchel, M
    Klumpp, B
    Laub, G
    Finn, JP
    Claussen, CD
    Miller, S
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2006, 178 (05): : 515 - 524
  • [23] Chronic anal fissure: morphometric analysis of the anal canal at 3.0 Tesla MR imaging
    Ayşe Erden
    Elif Peker
    Zeynep Bıyıklı Gençtürk
    Abdominal Radiology, 2017, 42 : 423 - 434
  • [24] Chronic anal fissure: morphometric analysis of the anal canal at 3.0 Tesla MR imaging
    Erden, Ayse
    Peker, Elif
    Genctuerk, Zeynep Biyikli
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (02) : 423 - 434
  • [25] Localization of pancreatic insulinomas with MR imaging at 0.5 T
    Catalano, C
    Pavone, P
    Laghi, A
    Panebianco, V
    Fraioli, F
    Peiconi, F
    Napoli, A
    Passariello, R
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 1999, 40 (06) : 644 - 648
  • [26] Physical therapy and imaging outcome measures in a haemophilia population treated with factor prophylaxis: current status and future directions
    Manco-Johnson, MJ
    Pettersson, H
    Petrini, P
    Babyn, PS
    Bergstrom, BM
    Bradley, CS
    Doria, AS
    Feldman, BM
    Funk, S
    Hilliard, P
    Kilcoyne, R
    Lundin, B
    Nuss, R
    Rivard, G
    Schoenmakers, MAGC
    Van den Berg, M
    Wiedel, J
    Zourikian, N
    Blanchette, VS
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2004, 10 : 88 - 93
  • [27] Body Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Oncology: Imaging at 3 T
    Koh, Dow-Mu
    Lee, Jeong-Min
    Bittencourt, Leonardo Kayat
    Blackledge, Matthew
    Collins, David J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 24 (01) : 31 - +
  • [28] Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance
    Link, Thomas M.
    Stahl, Robert
    Woertler, Klaus
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (05) : 1135 - 1146
  • [29] Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance
    Thomas M. Link
    Robert Stahl
    Klaus Woertler
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 1135 - 1146
  • [30] Abdominal imaging at 4 T MR system: a preliminary result
    Uematsu, H
    Dougherty, L
    Takahashi, M
    Ohno, Y
    Nakatsu, M
    Schnall, MD
    Hatabu, H
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 47 (02) : 161 - 163