Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives

被引:0
|
作者
Nicolae Bolog
Daniel Nanz
Dominik Weishaupt
机构
[1] University Hospital,Institute of Diagnostic Radiology
来源
European Radiology | 2006年 / 16卷
关键词
MR imaging; 3 Tesla; Musculoskeletal imaging;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important diagnostic tool in evaluation of the musculoskeletal system. While most examinations are currently performed at magnetic field strengths of 1.5 T or lower, whole-body MR systems operating at 3.0 T have recently become available for clinical use. The higher field strengths promise various benefits, including increased signal-to-noise ratios, enhanced T2* contrast, increased chemical shift resolution, and most likely a better diagnostic performance in various applications. However, the changed T1, T2, and T2* relaxation times, the increased resonance-frequency differences caused by susceptibility and chemical-shift differences, and the increased absorption of radiofrequency (RF) energy by the tissues pose new challenges and/or offer new opportunities for imaging at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T. Some of these issues have been successfully addressed only in the very recent past. This review discusses technical aspects of 3.0 T imaging as far as they have an impact on clinical routine. An overview of the current data is presented, with a focus on areas where 3.0 T promises equivalent or improved performance compared 1.5 T or lower field strengths.
引用
收藏
页码:1298 / 1307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives
    Bolog, Nicolae
    Nanz, Daniel
    Weishaupt, Dominik
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (06) : 1298 - 1307
  • [2] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of Ovarian Neoplasms: Current Status and Future Perspectives
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    Cuenod, Charles A.
    Darai, Emile
    Marsault, Claude
    Bazot, Marc
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 16 (04) : 661 - +
  • [3] Future Perspectives and Challenges of Prostate MR Imaging
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter L.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 56 (02) : 327 - +
  • [4] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of the Liver: Current Status and Future Directions
    Do, Richard Kinh Gian
    Rusinek, Henry
    Taouli, Bachir
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 17 (02) : 339 - +
  • [5] Interventional MR imaging: state of the art and future perspectives
    Kahn, T
    Schwarzmaier, HJ
    Modder, U
    RADIOLOGE, 1998, 38 (03): : 159 - 167
  • [6] MR urography in children: current status and future development
    Borthne, A
    Pierre-Jerome, C
    Nordshus, T
    Reiseter, T
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (03) : 503 - 511
  • [7] 3.0 T MR investigation of CLIPPERS: Role of susceptibility weighted and perfusion weighted imaging
    Pesaresi, Ilaria
    Sabato, Mario
    Desideri, Ilaria
    Puglioli, Michele
    Moretti, Policarpo
    Cosottini, Mirco
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 31 (09) : 1640 - 1642
  • [8] Human subthalamic nucleus: evaluation with high-resolution MR imaging at 3.0 T
    Kitajima, Mika
    Korogi, Yukunori
    Kakeda, Shingo
    Moriya, Junji
    Ohnari, Norihiro
    Sato, Toru
    Hayashida, Yoshiko
    Hirai, Toshinori
    Okuda, Tomoko
    Yamashita, Yasuyuki
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2008, 50 (08) : 675 - 681
  • [9] Human subthalamic nucleus: evaluation with high-resolution MR imaging at 3.0 T
    Mika Kitajima
    Yukunori Korogi
    Shingo Kakeda
    Junji Moriya
    Norihiro Ohnari
    Toru Sato
    Yoshiko Hayashida
    Toshinori Hirai
    Tomoko Okuda
    Yasuyuki Yamashita
    Neuroradiology, 2008, 50 : 675 - 681
  • [10] Artificial Intelligence in Musculoskeletal Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions
    Gyftopoulos, Soterios
    Lin, Dana
    Knoll, Florian
    Doshi, Ankur M.
    Rodrigues, Tatiane Cantarelli
    Recht, Michael P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (03) : 506 - 513