Ethical, regulatory and scientific challenges in paediatric drug development

被引:0
作者
Rose K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Pharmaceutical Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel
[2] Department of Pharmaceutical Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel
关键词
Children; Ethics; European Medicines Agency; Food and Drug Administration; Legislation; Pharmaceutical industry; Regulatory process;
D O I
10.1007/BF03256707
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drug development is a complex process that calls for the balancing of the requirements of a number of interests, including those of the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, science, ethics, politics and, not least, the patient. Originally the domain of academia, drug development is now performed by the pharmaceutical industry and controlled by regulatory authorities. It has created its own global frameworks, culminating in the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) regulations; for example, on good clinical practice (GCP) standards. Over the last few decades, the demand for a stronger focus on drug treatment in children has developed from the voices of just a few paediatricians into action by governments and regulatory authorities. The pendulum of scientific and ethical consensus has swung away from emphasizing the need to protect children against research. Children will always need protection in research; however, research to improve child health is now perceived as an ethical obligation and delays in passing benefits from pharmaceutical progress as unethical. The ethics of using child research to guide risk assessment in balance with the potential benefit to the single child, and children in general, is constantly evolving. In 1997, the first successful paediatric legislation was introduced in the US and reduced the paediatric off-label use of medications primarily developed for adults. As part of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act (FDAMA) it offered an added period of patent protection to reward paediatric research. It was further complemented in 2003 by the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) that made it a mandatory requirement for pharmaceutical companies to take children into consideration during the drug development process. FDAMA was re-authorized in 2002 as the Best Pharmaceuticals For Children Act (BPCA), and both acts, mandatory PREA and voluntary BPCA, were re-authorized in 2007 under the FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA) that also enacted new paediatric medical device provisions. After many years of deliberation, an EU paediatric regulation came into force in 2007 that combines voluntary and mandatory aspects. Even more so than the US laws, this legislation emphasizes the need for the inclusion of children at an early stage of the drug development process. There is also increasing cooperation between the regulatory authorities in the US, EU and Japan with regard to the use of medicines in children. Research into rare childhood diseases is facilitated by paediatric and orphan drug legislation. In addition, the health of children in the developing world is gaining higher visibility with the new World Health Organization campaign to "make medicines child size". Paediatric drug development is evolving as a complex process on the background of the globalization of trade, transport, travel, science, culture and politics. Continuing the dialogue between all partners in healthcare will be essential if an appropriate balance between risks, resources and benefits is to be reached. © 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 234
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fostering open collaboration in drug development for paediatric brain tumours
    Wong, Jong Fu
    Brown, Elizabeth J.
    Williams, Eleanor
    Bullock, Alex N.
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2019, 47 : 1471 - 1479
  • [42] Ethical challenges in mass drug administration for reducing childhood mortality: a qualitative study
    Ahmed Alasmar
    Alex C. Kong
    Anthony D. So
    Matthew DeCamp
    Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 11
  • [43] Challenges and opportunities in childhood cancer drug development
    Norris, Robin E.
    Adamson, Peter C.
    NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2012, 12 (11) : 776 - 782
  • [44] ACCELERATE Paediatric Strategy Forums: an advance for oncological drug development?
    Pearson, Andrew D. J.
    de Rojas, Teresa
    Karres, Dominik
    Reaman, Gregory
    Scobie, Nicole
    Fox, Elizabeth
    Lesa, Giovanni
    Ligas, Franca
    Norga, Koen
    Nysom, Karsten
    Pappo, Alberto
    Weigel, Brenda
    Weiner, Susan
    Vassal, Gilles
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2022, 23 (11) : 1354 - 1357
  • [45] Ethical challenges in developing drugs for psychiatric disorders
    Carrier, Felix
    Banayan, David
    Boley, Randy
    Karnik, Niranjan
    PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2017, 152 : 58 - 69
  • [46] Future development of a depot antiepileptic drug: What are the ethical implications?
    Sequeira, Alexandra J.
    Buchman, Stephanie
    Lewis, Ariane
    Karceski, Steven
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 85 : 183 - 187
  • [47] Role of Model-Informed Drug Development in Pediatric Drug Development, Regulatory Evaluation, and Labeling
    Bi, Youwei
    Liu, Jiang
    Li, Lingjue
    Yu, Jingyu
    Bhattaram, Atul
    Bewernitz, Michael
    Li, Ruo-jing
    Liu, Chao
    Earp, Justin
    Ma, Lian
    Zhuang, Luning
    Yang, Yuching
    Zhang, Xinyuan
    Zhu, Hao
    Wang, Yaning
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 59 : S104 - S111
  • [48] Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation
    Nunes, R
    THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2001, 22 (04) : 337 - 349
  • [49] Ethical Dimension of Paediatric Cochlear Implantation
    Rui Nunes
    Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2001, 22 : 337 - 349
  • [50] The consequences of 'Brexit' for drug discovery and development, and the regulatory implications
    Golding, Bernard T.
    Waring, Michael J.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2018, 13 (07) : 583 - 585