Ethical, regulatory and scientific challenges in paediatric drug development

被引:0
|
作者
Rose K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Pharmaceutical Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel
[2] Department of Pharmaceutical Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel
关键词
Children; Ethics; European Medicines Agency; Food and Drug Administration; Legislation; Pharmaceutical industry; Regulatory process;
D O I
10.1007/BF03256707
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drug development is a complex process that calls for the balancing of the requirements of a number of interests, including those of the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, science, ethics, politics and, not least, the patient. Originally the domain of academia, drug development is now performed by the pharmaceutical industry and controlled by regulatory authorities. It has created its own global frameworks, culminating in the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) regulations; for example, on good clinical practice (GCP) standards. Over the last few decades, the demand for a stronger focus on drug treatment in children has developed from the voices of just a few paediatricians into action by governments and regulatory authorities. The pendulum of scientific and ethical consensus has swung away from emphasizing the need to protect children against research. Children will always need protection in research; however, research to improve child health is now perceived as an ethical obligation and delays in passing benefits from pharmaceutical progress as unethical. The ethics of using child research to guide risk assessment in balance with the potential benefit to the single child, and children in general, is constantly evolving. In 1997, the first successful paediatric legislation was introduced in the US and reduced the paediatric off-label use of medications primarily developed for adults. As part of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act (FDAMA) it offered an added period of patent protection to reward paediatric research. It was further complemented in 2003 by the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) that made it a mandatory requirement for pharmaceutical companies to take children into consideration during the drug development process. FDAMA was re-authorized in 2002 as the Best Pharmaceuticals For Children Act (BPCA), and both acts, mandatory PREA and voluntary BPCA, were re-authorized in 2007 under the FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA) that also enacted new paediatric medical device provisions. After many years of deliberation, an EU paediatric regulation came into force in 2007 that combines voluntary and mandatory aspects. Even more so than the US laws, this legislation emphasizes the need for the inclusion of children at an early stage of the drug development process. There is also increasing cooperation between the regulatory authorities in the US, EU and Japan with regard to the use of medicines in children. Research into rare childhood diseases is facilitated by paediatric and orphan drug legislation. In addition, the health of children in the developing world is gaining higher visibility with the new World Health Organization campaign to "make medicines child size". Paediatric drug development is evolving as a complex process on the background of the globalization of trade, transport, travel, science, culture and politics. Continuing the dialogue between all partners in healthcare will be essential if an appropriate balance between risks, resources and benefits is to be reached. © 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 234
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Ethical Challenges of the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism
    Candace A. Martinez
    J. D. Bowen
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 117 : 807 - 821
  • [22] Emotions at (scientific) work : ethical challenges and methodological strategies to investigate an intimate field
    Villani, Michela
    Mileti, Francesca Poglia
    Mellini, Laura
    Sulstarova, Brikela
    Singy, Pascal
    GENRE SEXUALITE & SOCIETE, 2014, 12
  • [23] Paediatric drug development: are population models predictive of pharmacokinetics across paediatric populations?
    Cella, Massimo
    Zhao, Wei
    Jacqz-Aigrain, Evelyne
    Burger, David
    Danhof, Meindert
    Della Pasqua, Oscar
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 72 (03) : 454 - 464
  • [24] Remote participatory research has logistical benefits, but presents scientific and ethical challenges
    Fouqueray, Timothee
    Levesque, Ann
    Turgeon, Katrine
    Bissonnette, Jean-Francois
    Calme, Sophie
    Dupras, Jerome
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (02)
  • [25] Ethical and legal challenges in bioenergy governance: Coping with value disagreement and regulatory complexity
    Gamborg, Christian
    Anker, Helle Tegner
    Sandoe, Peter
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 69 : 326 - 333
  • [26] Ethical and Regulatory Challenges in Psychophysiology and Neuroscience-Based Technology for Determining Behavior
    Shamoo, Adil E.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2010, 17 (01): : 8 - 29
  • [27] Ethical, Legal and Regulatory Issues of Paediatric Translational Research. Call for an Adequate Model of Governance
    Altavilla, Annagrazia
    Giannuzzi, Viviana
    Lupo, Mariangela
    Bonifazi, Donato
    Ceci, Adriana
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW, 2020, 27 (03) : 213 - 231
  • [28] Challenges to deep brain stimulation: a pragmatic response to ethical, fiscal, and regulatory concerns
    Fins, Joseph J.
    Dorfman, Gary S.
    Pancrazio, Joseph J.
    BRAIN STIMULATION IN NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 1265 : 80 - 90
  • [29] Changing incentives to ACCELERATE drug development for paediatric cancer
    de Rojas, Teresa
    Kearns, Pamela
    Blanc, Patricia
    Skolnik, Jeffrey
    Fox, Elizabeth
    Knox, Leona
    Rousseau, Raphael
    Doz, Francois
    Bird, Nick
    Pearson, Andrew J.
    Vassal, Gilles
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (07): : 8825 - 8837
  • [30] Modelling and simulation as research tools in paediatric drug development
    Bellanti, Francesco
    Della Pasqua, Oscar
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 67 : S75 - S86