Meiobenthos and free-living nematodes as tools for biomonitoring environments affected by riverine impact

被引:0
作者
F. Semprucci
F. Frontalini
C. Sbrocca
E. Armynot du Châtelet
V. Bout-Roumazeilles
R. Coccioni
M. Balsamo
机构
[1] Università degli Studi di Urbino ‘Carlo Bo’,Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, della Vita e dell’Ambiente (DiSTeVA)
[2] Université Lille 1,UMR 8217 CNRS Géosystèmes
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2015年 / 187卷
关键词
Meiofauna; Nematodes; Water Framework Directive; Bioindicators; Water quality; Po river plume;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effects of the human impact on the coastal environments and relative biota can be different and even greater than those derived by natural fluctuations. The major disturbance causes in the coastal systems are rivers that may be important sources of nutrients and pollutants, particularly in a semi-closed basin such as the Adriatic Sea. In this context, we investigated the distribution of both meiobenthic and nematode assemblages in the Central Adriatic Sea to evaluate whether and how they are influenced by riverine discharges and which faunal descriptors are the most effective in detecting this type of stress. On the basis of our results, the disturbance effects in the studied area might be caused by both local streams and Po plume, and even if the latter might be considered of lesser extent, it is worthy to note its real impact at a short distance from the coastline. Meiobenthic assemblage structure appears as a good tool for detecting short-term responses of the benthic domain, whereas nematode assemblages seem more useful for defining long-term responses. Accordingly, the former highlighted from poor to sufficient ecological quality status (EQS) of this area, whereas the latter from moderate to bad EQS. Life strategy traits prove to be the most informative faunal descriptor due to their high correspondence with the environmental variables and particularly with this type of disturbance.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 311 条
  • [1] Alves AS(2013)Benthic meiofauna as indicator of ecological changes in estuarine ecosystems: the use of nematodes in ecological quality assessment Ecological Indicators 24 462-475
  • [2] Adão H(2013)Community structure of harpacticoid copepods from the southeast continental shelf of India Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 3 87-100
  • [3] Ferrero TJ(2009)Biodiversity patterns of free-living marine nematodes in a tropical bay: Cienfuegos, Caribbean Sea Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science 85 179-189
  • [4] Marques JC(2010)Effects of organic enrichment on nematode assemblages in a microcosm experiment Marine Environmental Research 70 374-382
  • [5] Costa MJ(2013)Environmental control on shell structure and composition of agglutinated foraminifera along a proximal–distal transect in the Marmara Sea Marine Geology 335 114-128
  • [6] Patrício J(1997)The Adriatic Sea general circulation, part I: baroclinic circulation structure Journal of Physical Oceanography 27 1515-1532
  • [7] Ansari KGMT(2010)Meiofauna of the Adriatic Sea: current state of knowledge and future perspectives Chemistry and Ecology 26 45-63
  • [8] Lyla PS(2011)Laboratory study on individual and combined effects of cobalt- and zinc-spiked sediment on meiobenthic nematodes Biological Trace Elements Research 144 790-803
  • [9] Ajmal Khan S(1990)On the potential of basing an ecological typology of aquatic sediments on the nematode fauna: an example from the river Rhine Hydrobiology Bulletin 24 37-45
  • [10] Manokaran S(1991)Interpretation of disturbance-induced maturity decrease in marine nematode assemblages by means of the maturity index Marine Ecology Progress Series 76 135-142