Measuring sustainable development goals: an application of modern portfolio theory on sustainability systems

被引:0
作者
Humberto S. Brandi
Silvio F. dos Santos
机构
[1] Sociedade Brasileira de Metrologia,
[2] Instituto Nacional de Metrologia,undefined
[3] Qualidade e Tecnologia (Inmetro),undefined
来源
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | 2020年 / 22卷
关键词
Sustainability; Sustainable development; Modern portfolio theory; Energy; Sustainable development goals; Goal 7;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This work presents an application of the modern portfolio theory (MPT). The United Nations 2030 Agenda of sustainable development goals establishes 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) and 169 targets each associated with indicators, integrating the economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. This constitutes a complex system to be used by more than 150 countries having different priorities and levels of development. Concerning the 2030 Agenda Goals, MPT can help to define strategies to handle resource allocation problems. In economics, MPT appraises that when choosing a portfolio of assets looking for returns, some investors prefer fewer risks; others accept higher risks. To optimize the countries’ path to sustainability, the decision makers may distribute their resources, acting similarly to an investor. In this case, an SDG corresponds to a portfolio and the assets to the indicators associated with a given Goal. Constructing an efficient frontier of optimal portfolios of assets, MPT provides a method to obtain the maximum possible expected returns for a given level of risk and, besides, the risks and expected returns involved in a weighting choice. The present work restricts the analyses to the indicators of Goal 7 (affordable and clean energy), related to energy sustainability, for the five BRICS countries. This choice leads to an ensemble of situations that highlights the applicability of MPT to sustainability. Calculations are presented in detail for Brazil, and a general discussion is presented for the BRICS. The present approach considers the main features of a multi-criteria decision-making method, except the ranking of options by the decision makers.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 815
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Asadabadi MR(2019)Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process (ANP) Cogent Eng 6 1623153-268
[2]  
Chang E(2010)Bibliometric analysis of multiple criteria decision making/multiattribute utility theory Lect Notes Econ Math Syst 634 259-260
[3]  
Saberi M(2014)Mean-variance portfolio selection with correlation risk J Comput Appl Math 19 245-1973
[4]  
Bragge J(2010)Measuring corporate environmental performance: the trade-offs of sustainability ratings Bus Strategy Environ 17 1963-505
[5]  
Korhonen P(2015)Model framework to construct a single aggregate sustainability indicator: an application to the biodiesel supply chain Clean Technol Environ Policy 18 493-371
[6]  
Wallenius H(2016)Application of the GUM approach to estimate uncertainty in measurements of sustainability systems Clean Technol Environ Policy 18 359-2453
[7]  
Wallenius J(2016)Introducing measurement science into sustainability systems Clean Technol Environ Policy 19 2443-198
[8]  
Chiu MC(2017)Selecting portfolios of indicators for composite indexes—application of modern portfolio theory to competitiveness Clean Technol Environ Policy 84 189-609
[9]  
Wong HY(2019)An interval extension of the outranking approach and its application to multiple-criteria ordinal classification Omega 69 596-32
[10]  
Delmas M(1953)Social choice and individual values Am Sociol Rev 9 5-557