Responses of water productivity to irrigation and N supply for hybrid maize seed production in an arid region of Northwest China

被引:0
作者
Hui Ran
Shaozhong Kang
Fusheng Li
Taisheng Du
Risheng Ding
Sien Li
Ling Tong
机构
[1] China Agricultural University,Center for Agricultural Water Research in China
[2] Guangxi University,College of Agriculture
来源
Journal of Arid Land | 2017年 / 9卷
关键词
water use efficiency; water stress; nitrogen use efficiency; evapotranspiration; water productivity for yield; water productivity for biomass; arid region;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Water and nitrogen (N) are generally two of the most important factors in determining the crop productivity. Proper water and N managements are prerequisites for agriculture sustainable development in arid areas. Field experiments were conducted to study the responses of water productivity for crop yield (WPY-ET) and final biomass (WPB-ET) of film-mulched hybrid maize seed production to different irrigation and N treatments in the Hexi Corridor, Northwest China during April to September in 2013 and also during April to September in 2014. Three irrigation levels (70%–65%, 60%–55%, and 50%–45% of the field capacity) combined with three N rates (500, 400, and 300 kg N/hm2) were tested in 2013. The N treatments were adjusted to 500, 300, and 100 kg N/hm2 in 2014. Results showed that the responses of WPY-ET and WPB-ET to different irrigation amounts were different. WPY-ET was significantly reduced by lowering irrigation amounts while WPB-ET stayed relatively insensitive to irrigation amounts. However, WPY-ET and WPB-ET behaved consistently when subjected to different N treatments. There was a slight effect of reducing N input from 500 to 300 kg/hm2 on the WPY-ET and WPB-ET, however, when reducing N input to 100 kg/hm2, the values of WPY-ET and WPB-ET were significantly reduced. Water is the primary factor and N is the secondary factor in determining both yield (Y) and final biomass (B). Partial factor productivity from applied N (PFPN) was the maximum under the higher irrigation level and in lower N rate (100–300 kg N/hm2) in both years (2013 and 2014). Lowering the irrigation amount significantly reduced evapotranspiration (ET), but ET did not vary with different N rates (100–500 kg N/hm2). Both Y and B had robust linear relationships with ET, but the correlation between B and ET (R2=0.8588) was much better than that between Y and ET (R2=0.6062). When ET increased, WPY-ET linearly increased and WPB-ET decreased. Taking the indices of Y, B, WPY-ET, WPB-ET and PFPN into account, a higher irrigation level (70%–65% of the field capacity) and a lower N rate (100–300 kg N/hm2) are recommended to be a proper irrigation and N application strategy for plastic film-mulched hybrid maize seed production in arid Northwest China.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 514
页数:10
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Bryant K J(1992)Simulating corn yield response to irrigation timings: validation of the EPIC model Journal of Production Agriculture 5 237-242
[2]  
Benson V W(2004)Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn Field Crops Research 89 1-16
[3]  
Kiniry J R(2011)Integrated soil-crop system management for food security Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 6399-6404
[4]  
Çakir R(2010)In-season nitrogen management strategy for winter wheat: Maximizing yields, minimizing environmental impact in an over-fertilization context Field Crops Research 116 140-146
[5]  
Chen X P(2008)Yield response of corn to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean environment Field Crops Research 105 202-210
[6]  
Cui Z L(2010)An improved water use efficiency of cereals under temporal and spatial deficit irrigation in north China Agricultural Water Management 97 66-74
[7]  
Vitousek P M(2015)Deficit irrigation and sustainable water–resource strategies in agriculture for China’s food security Journal of Experimental Botany 66 2253-2269
[8]  
Cui Z L(1996)Perspectives on deficit irrigation Agricultural Water Management 32 1-14
[9]  
Zhang F S(2006)Comparative response of maize ( Agricultural Water Management 83 135-143
[10]  
Chen X P(1978) L.) and sorghum ( Annual Review of Plant Physiology 29 277-317