Bibliometric analysis of bioeconomy research in South Africa

被引:0
作者
Thabang Lazarus Bambo
Anastassios Pouris
机构
[1] University of Pretoria,Institute for Technology Innovation, Graduate School of Technology Management
来源
Scientometrics | 2020年 / 125卷
关键词
Bioeconomy; Biotechnology; Bibliometric; South Africa;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This document provides an analysis of bioeconomy research in South Africa and it discusses sources of growth in the country’s bioeconomy literature in general. We performed bibliometric analysis as indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) for number of South African authored publications and citations in bioeconomy, and compared them with Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRICS) and selected countries for the period 2008 to 2018. The WoS is used for research dealing with the scientific dynamic of a particular topic in most widely diffused journals and for citation analysis. The results highlight South Africa ranked last in the BRICS group in terms of number of bioeconomy publications produced in the selected period, and has a world share of 0.8%, which is higher than the national research average of 0.5%. The citations growth for South Africa bioeconomy publication increased by 6.8%, higher than Brazil, Russia and world citations during the period under review. The University of Cape Town is a leader in bioeconomy publications in South Africa followed by University of Stellenbosch and the University of KwaZulu Natal, with majority of the publications on environmental sciences ecology. South Africa collaborates the most with institutions from the United States of America in bioeconomy research, and the percent of international collaboration is similar with that of national scientific publications. However, South Africa experienced a decline in bioeconomy industry collaboration publications during this period.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 51
页数:22
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]  
Abramo G(2012)What is appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? Scientometrics 93 1005-1017
[2]  
D’Angelo CA(2012)Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis Scientometrics 91 343-351
[3]  
Cicero T(2013)Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology research in Pakistan Scientometrics 95 529-540
[4]  
Aguillo I(2000)Patent statistics as indicators of competition - an analysis of patenting in biotechnology Scientometrics 47 95-116
[5]  
Bajwa RS(2017)Evidence of a vocalic proto-system in the baboon ( PLoS ONE 66 1507-1513
[6]  
Yaldram K(2015)) suggests pre-hominin speech precursors Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 8 691-213
[7]  
Banerjee P(2016)BRICS countries and scientific excellence: a bibliometric analysis of most frequently-cited papers Sustainability 5 1088-34
[8]  
Gupta BM(2018)What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature 2016 Austin Journal of Biotechnology and Bioengineering 55 189-22
[9]  
Garg KC(2002)Application and current trends of biotechnology: a brief review Scientometrics 30 23-280
[10]  
Boë L-J(2016)Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology PLoS ONE 3 4-85