A comparison of the technical efficiency of accounting firms among the US, China, and Taiwan under the framework of a stochastic metafrontier production function

被引:0
作者
Bao-Guang Chang
Tai-Hsin Huang
Chun-Yi Kuo
机构
[1] Tamkang University,Department of Accounting
[2] National Cheng-Chi University,Department of Money and Banking
[3] Tamkang University,Graduate Institute of Management Sciences, Accounting
来源
Journal of Productivity Analysis | 2015年 / 44卷
关键词
Accounting firms; Technical efficiency; TGR; Stochastic metafrontier approach; M41; C51; D24;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study employs the newly developed stochastic metafrontier production function by Huang et al. (A new approach to estimating the metafrontier production function based on a stochastic frontier framework. Working paper, Vanderbilt University, National Cheng-chi University, Taiwan, 2012) to compare the technical efficiencies of accounting firms (AFs) among the US, China, and Taiwan, operating under different technologies. Although AFs play an important role in a nation’s capital market, the accounting industry has not attracted much attention to academic researchers. The main difference between the stochastic metafrontier function and the one proposed by Battese et al. (J Prod Anal 21:91–103, 2004) and O’Donnell et al. (Empir Econ 34:231–255, 2008) lies in the second step, where the stochastic frontier approach (SFA) is recommended instead of programming techniques. Taiwan’s AFs are found to have the highest average metafrontier technical efficiency (MTE) and AFs in the US have the highest technology gap ratio (TGR). Nonetheless, the average TGR and MTE values of American AFs are closer to those of Taiwan. The low performance of Chinese AFs may be attributed to government regulations and the lack of market competition. However, the programming technique suggests reverse results for AFs in Taiwan and the US and larger variances for TGR and MTE. Then these three countries’ AFs show decreasing returns to scale, indicating that mergers and acquisitions may not be advantageous for expanding their production scale.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 349
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Banker RD(2003)The public accounting industry production function J Acc Econ 35 255-281
  • [2] Chang H(2005)Productivity change, technical progress, and relative efficiency change in the public accounting industry Manage Sci 51 291-304
  • [3] Cunningham R(2007)Estimating DEA technical and allocative inefficiency using aggregate cost or revenue data J Prod Anal 27 115-121
  • [4] Banker RD(1992)Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India J Prod Anal 3 153-169
  • [5] Chang H(2002)Technology gap, efficiency and a stochastic metafrontier function Int J Bus Econ 1 87-93
  • [6] Natarajan R(2004)A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies J Prod Anal 21 91-103
  • [7] Banker RD(2007)Is there a single frontier in a single European banking market? J Bank Finance 31 2081-2102
  • [8] Chang H(2004)Auditor human capital and audit firm survival The Dutch audit industry in 1930–1992 Acc Organ Soc 29 627-646
  • [9] Natarajan R(2009)Using Malmquist indexes to measure changes in the productivity and efficiency of US accounting firms before and after the Sarbanes–Oxley Act Omega 37 951-960
  • [10] Battese GE(2009)Measuring productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes of CPA firms prior to, and following the Sarbanes–Oxley Act Socio-Econ Plan Sci 43 221-228