Spotlight on the real-world treatment of CML pts in Germany: a retrospective survey in private oncology practices

被引:0
作者
Georg-Nikolaus Franke
Gunnar Loewe
Marcel Reiser
Hartmut Linde
Andreas Josting
Eyck von der Heyde
Uwe Platzbecker
Rudolf Weide
Hans Tesch
Arndt Nusch
Jolanta Dengler
Kathleen Jentsch-Ullrich
机构
[1] University of Leipzig Medical Center,Department for Hematology, Cellular Therapies, Hemostaseology and Infectious Diseases
[2] Novartis Pharma GmbH,Schwerpunktpraxis für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie
[3] PIOH-Zentrum Praxis Internistischer Onkologie und Hämatologie,undefined
[4] MVZ für Blut- und Krebserkrankungen,undefined
[5] Hämatologie und Palliativmedizin,undefined
[6] Studienzentrum am Raschplatz GbR,undefined
[7] Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie,undefined
[8] Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien,undefined
[9] MVZ-Onkologie Velbert/Ratingen GbR,undefined
[10] Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Heilbronn,undefined
[11] Gemeinschaftspraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie,undefined
来源
Annals of Hematology | 2024年 / 103卷
关键词
Chronic myeloid leukemia; real-world data;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical trials in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are usually carried out in specialized centers whereas primary care for patients (pts) with CML is mainly provided by local oncology practices. The aim of this study was to assess treatment practices in pts with CML in the setting of private oncology practices in Germany. We collected data of 819 pts with a confirmed diagnosis (dx) of CML in 2013 or later from 43 practices. At dx, 84.2% (n=690) and 9.4% (n=77) of pts were in chronic or accelerated phase, 0.7% (n=6) had a blast crisis. Molecular monitoring was provided by EUTOS certified laboratories in 87.7% of pts. Typical BCR::ABL1 transcripts were detected in 86.6% (n=709). Molecular response was assessed after 2.8, 6.0, 9.4 and 12.9 m (mean) after start of treatment. Of the pts with available data, 11.1% did not achieve early molecular response and at 18 m, 83.7% had at least a major molecular response. 288 (35.2%) of pts switched to 2nd line (2L) treatment after a mean of 21.0 months. Reasons for 2L treatment were side effects in 43.4% and suboptimal response or failure in 31.4% of pts. 106 pts went on to third line (3L) treatment. 36.8 % of pts switched to and 92.8 % of pts still on 3L treatment achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% at 12 m. In conclusion, in Germany pts with CML are routinely monitored by qPCR and good responses are achieved in the majority. Treatment changes are mainly due to adverse events rather than suboptimal responses.
引用
收藏
页码:1569 / 1575
页数:6
相关论文
共 68 条
[21]  
Hochhaus A(2003)Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 348 994-undefined
[22]  
Baccarani M(2022)Incidence, prevalence, and real-world treatment patterns in chronic myeloid leukemia: results from a population-representative german claims data analysis Oncol Res Treat 45 400-undefined
[23]  
Silver RT(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[24]  
White HE(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[25]  
Salmon M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[26]  
Albano F(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[27]  
Franke G-N(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[28]  
Maier J(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[29]  
Wildenberger K(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[30]  
Alikian M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined