The public dimension of scientific controversies

被引：0

作者：

Czubaroff J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Ursinus College,

来源：

Argumentation | 1997年 / 11卷 / 1期

关键词：

B; F; Skinner; Oral communication; Rhetoric of science; Scientific controversy;

D O I：

10.1023/A:1017934628335

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Acceptance of three tenets of the doctrine of scientific objectivity, namely, the tenets of consensus, compartmentalization, and ahistorical truth, undermines scientists' appreciation of the importance of scientific controversy and consideration of the policy and value implications of controversial scientific theories. This essay rejects these tenets and suggests scientists appreciate theoretical diversity, learn rational means for adjudicating value differences, and cultivate conversational as well as written forms of communication. © 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

引用

页码：51 / 74

页数：23

共 48 条

[21]

Klumpp J.F., Taking Social Argument Seriously, Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede, (1990)

[22]

Kuhn T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (1962)

[23]

Latour B., Woolgar S., Laboratory Life: the Social Construction of Scientific Facts, (1979)

[24]

Laudan L., Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, (1977)

[25]

Laudan L., Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, (1984)

[26]

Lee V., Beyond Behaviorism, (1988)

[27]

Mahoney M.J., Scientific Psychology and Radical Behaviorism: Important Distinctions Based in Scientism and Objectivism, American Psychologist, 44, 11, pp. 1372-1377, (1989)

[28]

Mahoney M.J., Diatribe Is Not Dialogue: On Selected Attempts to Attack and Defend Behaviorism, American Psychologist, 45, 10, pp. 1183-1184, (1990)

[29]

McKerrow R.E., Argument Communities, Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede, (1990)

[30]

B. F. Skinner: Consensus and Controversy, (1987)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →