Robust controller design for systems with probabilistic uncertain parameters using multi-objective genetic programming

被引:0
作者
Rammohan Mallipeddi
Iman Gholaminezhad
Mohammad S. Saeedi
Hirad Assimi
Ali Jamali
机构
[1] Kyungpook National University,Department of Artificial Intelligence, College of IT
[2] University of Guilan,Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
[3] University Campus 2,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[4] University of Guilan,School of Computer Science
[5] University of Adelaide,undefined
来源
Soft Computing | 2021年 / 25卷
关键词
Genetic programming; Robust controller; Pareto; Monte Carlo simulation; Uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Optimal design of controllers without considering uncertainty in the plant dynamics can induce feedback instabilities and lead to obtaining infeasible controllers in practice. This paper presents a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm integrated with Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) to perform the optimal stochastic design of robust controllers for uncertain time-delay systems. Each potential optimal solution represents a controller in the form of a transfer function with the optimal numerator and denominator polynomials. The proposed methodology uses genetic programming to evolve robust controllers. Using GP enables the algorithm to optimize the structure of the controller and tune the parameters in a holistic approach. The proposed methodology employs MCS to apply robust optimization and uses a new adaptive operator to balance exploration and exploitation in the search space. The performance of controllers is assessed in the closed-loop system with respect to three objective functions as (1) minimization of mean integral time absolute error (ITAE), (2) minimization of the standard deviation of ITAE and (3) minimization of maximum control effort. The new methodology is applied to the first-order and second-order systems with dead time. We evaluate the performance of obtained robust controllers with respect to the upper and lower bounds of step responses and control variables. We also perform a post-processing analysis considering load disturbance and external noise; we illustrate the robustness of the designed controllers by cumulative distribution functions of objective functions for different uncertainty levels. We show how the proposed methodology outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 249
页数:16
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [11] Chen Z(1996)Methods to compute probabilistic measures of robustness for structural systems J Vibration Control 2 447-463
  • [12] Biswas PP(2012)Evolving controllers for high-level applications on a service robot: a case study with exhibition visitor flow control Genet Program Evolvable Mach 13 239-263
  • [13] Suganthan PN(2016)A multi-objective differential evolution approach based on ε-elimination uniform-diversity for mechanisms design Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 52 861-877
  • [14] Mallipeddi R(2019)Multiple response optimization: analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions Knowl-Based Syst 179 21-33
  • [15] Amaratunga GAJ(2008)Pareto optimum design of robust PI controllers for systems with parametric uncertainty Int Rev Mech Eng 1 628-640
  • [16] Biwer A(2018)Guide them through: an automatic crowd control framework using multi-objective genetic programming Appl Soft Comput 66 90-103
  • [17] Griffith S(2010)Reliability-based robust Pareto design of linear state feedback controllers using a multi-objective uniform-diversity genetic algorithm (MUGA) Expert Syst Appl 37 401-413
  • [18] Cooney C(2013)Probability of failure for uncertain control systems using neural networks and multi-objective uniform-diversity genetic algorithms (MUGA) Eng Appl Artif Intell 26 714-723
  • [19] Blasco X(2013)Robust Pareto active suspension design for vehicle vibration model with probabilistic uncertain parameters Multi-body Syst Dyn 30 265-285
  • [20] Herrero JM(2014)Multi-objective genetic programming approach for robust modeling of complex manufacturing processes having probabilistic uncertainty in experimental data J Intell Manuf 28 149-163