Evaluating construction land use efficiency under carbon emission constraints: A comparative study of China and the USA

被引:0
作者
Ying Wang
Ji Chai
Hongwei Zhang
Bin Yang
机构
[1] China University of Geosciences,School of Public Administration
[2] Key Laboratory for Rule of Law Research,School of Public Policy & Management
[3] Ministry of Natural Resources,undefined
[4] China University of Mining and Technology,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Construction land use efficiency; Carbon emission; Abatement potential; China; The United States; Sustainable land management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research on construction land use efficiency with carbon emissions provides valuable insights for effective regulation of land use planning and low-carbon development. This study explores construction land use efficiency (CLUE) in China and the USA by employing a slack-based measure (SBM) that incorporates carbon emissions as undesirable output to evaluate CLUE at the provincial/state level. The abatement potential (AP) of construction land use and carbon emissions through the land utilization process are further explored. We find (1) that the average CLUE in China (0.512) is relatively higher than that in the USA, but the CLUE in both countries is at a relatively low level; (2) that carbon emissions, as undesirable output, have a negative impact on CLUE; and (3) that the average AP for construction land is 0.485 in China and 0.696 in the USA, while the average AP for carbon emissions is 0.500 in China and 0.576 in the USA. Understanding these characteristics can lead to better coordination of emissions reduction policies and land use policies to optimize the construction land inputs in both countries, thereby sustaining land use management while reducing carbon emission.
引用
收藏
页码:49998 / 50009
页数:11
相关论文
共 185 条
  • [1] Bai X(2014)Society: Realizing China’s urban dream Nature 509 158-160
  • [2] Shi P(2019)Land cover transitions in the United States South: 2007–2013 Appl Geogr 105 102-110
  • [3] Liu Y(2002)Urban mobility and urban form: The social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion Ecol Econ 40 199-216
  • [4] Bettinger P(2018)Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO J Clean Prod 197 895-907
  • [5] Merry K(2016) abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy): A SBM-DEA model with undesirable output China Habitat Int 53 274-283
  • [6] Camagni R(2019)Urban land expansion and the transitional mechanisms in Nanjing Cities 93 215-223
  • [7] Gibelli MC(2015)Exploring the industrial land use efficiency of China's resource-based cities Environ Sci Technol 49 13021-13030
  • [8] Rigamonti P(2018)Spatiotemporal changes of built-up land expansion and carbon emissions caused by the Chinese construction industry China Ann Oper Res 290 265-277
  • [9] Cecchini L(2015)Sustainable land use management for improving land eco-efficiency: A case study of Hebei Land Use Pol 45 1-7
  • [10] Venanzi S(2015)Impact of Urbanization on Cultivated Land Changes in China Energies 8 5516-5537