Linguistic drivers of misinformation diffusion on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:1
作者
Giandomenico Di Domenico
Annamaria Tuan
Marco Visentin
机构
[1] Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, Richmond Building, Portsmouth
[2] Department of Management, University of Bologna, Via Capo di Lucca 34, Bologna
关键词
Covid-19; Linguistic analysis; Machine learning; Misinformation; Twitter;
D O I
10.1007/s43039-021-00026-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, unprecedent amounts of fake news and hoax spread on social media. In particular, conspiracy theories argued on the effect of specific new technologies like 5G and misinformation tarnished the reputation of brands like Huawei. Language plays a crucial role in understanding the motivational determinants of social media users in sharing misinformation, as people extract meaning from information based on their discursive resources and their skillset. In this paper, we analyze textual and non-textual cues from a panel of 4923 tweets containing the hashtags #5G and #Huawei during the first week of May 2020, when several countries were still adopting lockdown measures, to determine whether or not a tweet is retweeted and, if so, how much it is retweeted. Overall, through traditional logistic regression and machine learning, we found different effects of the textual and non-textual cues on the retweeting of a tweet and on its ability to accumulate retweets. In particular, the presence of misinformation plays an interesting role in spreading the tweet on the network. More importantly, the relative influence of the cues suggests that Twitter users actually read a tweet but not necessarily they understand or critically evaluate it before deciding to share it on the social media platform. © The Author(s) 2021.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 369
页数:18
相关论文
共 85 条
[41]  
Lazer D.M., Baum M.A., Benkler Y., Berinsky A.J., Greenhill K.M., Menczer F., Metzger M.J., Nyhan B., Pennycook G., Rothschild D., Schudson M., The science of fake news, Science, 359, 6380, pp. 1094-1096, (2018)
[42]  
Leek S., Houghton D., Canning L., Twitter and behavioral engagement in the healthcare sector: An examination of product and service companies, Industrial Marketing Management, 81, pp. 115-129, (2019)
[43]  
Lewandowsky S., Ecker U.K., Seifert C.M., Schwarz N., Cook J., Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3, pp. 106-131, (2012)
[44]  
Margolin D., Markowitz D.M., A multitheoretical approach to big text data: comparing expressive and rhetorical logics in Yelp reviews, Communication Research, 45, 5, pp. 688-718, (2018)
[45]  
Martel C., Pennycook G., Rand D.G., Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, 1, pp. 1-20, (2020)
[46]  
Marwick A.E., Why do people share fake news? A sociotechnical model of media effects, Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2, 2, pp. 474-512, (2018)
[47]  
Mylan S., Hardman C., COVID-19, cults, and the anti-vax movement, The Lancet, 397, (2021)
[48]  
Natekin A., Knoll A., Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial, Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 7, (2013)
[49]  
Newman M.L., Pennebaker J.W., Berry D.S., Richards J.M., Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 5, pp. 665-675, (2003)
[50]  
Newman N., Fletcher R., Kalogeropoulos A., Levy D.A., Nielsen R.K., Reuters Digital News Report., (2017)