The impact of the relationship between lesion diameter and total core length on the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer for PI-RADS 3 lesions

被引:2
作者
Yakut, Emrah [1 ]
机构
[1] Yuksek Ihtisas Univ, Dept Urol, Igci Blokari,155 Cd 18-A, TR-06520 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Clinically significant prostate cancer; Lesion diameter; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate fusion biopsy; Total core length; VERSION; 2; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; BIOPSY; GUIDELINES; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-024-04845-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The aim of our study was to determine the effect of total core length (TCL) for prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) 3 lesions to facilitate clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection based on the lesion diameter. Materials and methods A total of 149 patients with at least 1 lesion with a PI-RADS 3 were evaluated retrospectively. The lesions with diameters of < 1 cm were categorized as small lesions and lesions of >= 1 cm were categorized as large lesions. The lengths of biopsy cores from PI-RADS 3 lesions were summed for each lesion separately, and TCL was calculated. The relationship between TCL and csPCa was analyzed separately for the small and large groups with multiple logistic regression analyses. Results A total of 208 lesions were detected by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MpMRI) in 149 males included in the study. The mean TCL was 44.68 mm (26-92) and the mean lesion diameter was 10.73 mm (4-27) in PIRADS 3 lesions. For small diameter lesions (< 1 cm), the odds of finding clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ciPCa) increase by 1.67 times if TCL increases by one unit. Hence, increasing TCL for small lesions only increases the odds of ciPCa detection. For large diameter lesions (>= 1 cm), if TCL increases by one unit, the odds of finding ciPCa increase 1.13 times and the odds of finding csPCa increases1.16 times. Accordingly, large lesions are more likely to have both csPCa and ciPCa as TCL increases. Conclusions Our study showed that for PI-RADS 3 lesions, both more csPCa and more ciPCa were detected as TCL increased. However, in lesions with a size of < 1 cm, only ciPCa was detected more frequently as TCL increased. In conclusion, taking more and longer biopsy cores in PI-RADS 3 lesions below 1 cm does not contribute to the detection of csPCa.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Barentsz, Jelle
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Turkbey, Bares
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Cornud, Francois
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Macura, Katarzyna F.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Verma, Sadhna
    Weinreb, Jeffery C.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (02) : 464 - 474
  • [22] The impact of core biopsy fragmentation in prostate cancer
    Reis, Leonardo Oliveira
    Salvo Reinato, Jose Alberto
    Silva, Daniel Carlos
    Matheus, Wagner Eduardo
    Denardi, Fernandes
    Ferreira, Ubirajara
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 42 (04) : 965 - 969
  • [23] Relationship between non-suspicious MRI and insignificant prostate cancer: results from a monocentric study
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Roupret, Morgan
    Comperat, Eva
    Rozet, Francois
    Granger, Benjamin
    Barkatz, Johann
    Bitker, Marc Olivier
    Lucidarme, Olivier
    Cussenot, Olivier
    Mozer, Pierre
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (05) : 673 - 678
  • [24] Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Puech, Philippe
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Claudon, Michel
    Roy, Catherine
    Mege-Lechevallier, Florence
    Decaussin-Petrucci, Myriam
    Dubreuil-Chambardel, Marine
    Magaud, Laurent
    Remontet, Laurent
    Ruffion, Alain
    Colombel, Marc
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    Schott, Anne-Marie
    Lemaitre, Laurent
    Rabilloud, Muriel
    Grenier, Nicolas
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (01) : 100 - 109
  • [25] Re: PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know
    Scialpi, M.
    Martorana, E.
    Scialpi, P.
    D'Andrea, A.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 71 (09) : 934 - 935
  • [26] Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)
    Van der Kwast, T.
    Bubendorf, L.
    Mazerolles, C.
    Raspollini, M. R.
    Van Leenders, G. J.
    Pihl, C. -G.
    Kujala, P.
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2013, 463 (03) : 367 - 377
  • [27] Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study
    van der Leest, Marloes
    Cornel, Erik
    Israel, Bas
    Hendriks, Rianne
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Hoogenboom, Martijn
    Zamecnik, Patrik
    Bakker, Dirk
    Setiasti, Anglita Yanti
    Veltman, Jeroen
    van den Hout, Huib
    van der Lelij, Hans
    van Oort, Inge
    Klaver, Sjoerd
    Debruyne, Frans
    Sedelaar, Michiel
    Hannink, Gerjon
    Rovers, Maroeska
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (04) : 570 - 578
  • [28] The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies
    Wegelin, Olivier
    Exterkate, Leonie
    van der Leest, Marloes
    Kummer, Jean A.
    Vreuls, Willem
    de Bruin, Peter C.
    Bosch, J. L. H. Ruud
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Somford, Diederik M.
    van Melick, Harm H. E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (04) : 582 - 590
  • [29] PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Cornud, Francois
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Margolis, Daniel
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Shtern, Faina
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Verma, Sadna
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 16 - 40
  • [30] A Critical Analysis of the Tumor Volume Threshold for Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer Using a Data Set of a Randomized Screening Trial
    Wolters, Tineke
    Roobol, Monique J.
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Hoedemaeker, Robert F.
    van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (01) : 121 - 125