The impact of the relationship between lesion diameter and total core length on the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer for PI-RADS 3 lesions

被引:2
作者
Yakut, Emrah [1 ]
机构
[1] Yuksek Ihtisas Univ, Dept Urol, Igci Blokari,155 Cd 18-A, TR-06520 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Clinically significant prostate cancer; Lesion diameter; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate fusion biopsy; Total core length; VERSION; 2; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; BIOPSY; GUIDELINES; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-024-04845-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The aim of our study was to determine the effect of total core length (TCL) for prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) 3 lesions to facilitate clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection based on the lesion diameter. Materials and methods A total of 149 patients with at least 1 lesion with a PI-RADS 3 were evaluated retrospectively. The lesions with diameters of < 1 cm were categorized as small lesions and lesions of >= 1 cm were categorized as large lesions. The lengths of biopsy cores from PI-RADS 3 lesions were summed for each lesion separately, and TCL was calculated. The relationship between TCL and csPCa was analyzed separately for the small and large groups with multiple logistic regression analyses. Results A total of 208 lesions were detected by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MpMRI) in 149 males included in the study. The mean TCL was 44.68 mm (26-92) and the mean lesion diameter was 10.73 mm (4-27) in PIRADS 3 lesions. For small diameter lesions (< 1 cm), the odds of finding clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ciPCa) increase by 1.67 times if TCL increases by one unit. Hence, increasing TCL for small lesions only increases the odds of ciPCa detection. For large diameter lesions (>= 1 cm), if TCL increases by one unit, the odds of finding ciPCa increase 1.13 times and the odds of finding csPCa increases1.16 times. Accordingly, large lesions are more likely to have both csPCa and ciPCa as TCL increases. Conclusions Our study showed that for PI-RADS 3 lesions, both more csPCa and more ciPCa were detected as TCL increased. However, in lesions with a size of < 1 cm, only ciPCa was detected more frequently as TCL increased. In conclusion, taking more and longer biopsy cores in PI-RADS 3 lesions below 1 cm does not contribute to the detection of csPCa.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Long, Lori
    Wilbur, Andrew R.
    Gomella, Patrick T.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Daneshvar, Michael A.
    Yerram, Nitin K.
    O'Connor, Luke P.
    Wang, Alex Z.
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Bloom, Jonathan
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Merino, Maria
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Pinsky, Paul
    Parnes, Howard
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2022, 5 (02): : 176 - 186
  • [2] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [3] Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Validation Cohort Study with Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping as the Reference Standard
    Arumainayagam, Nimalan
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Freeman, Alex
    Allen, Clare
    Sohaib, S. Aslam
    Kirkham, Alex
    van der Meulen, Jan
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (03) : 761 - 769
  • [4] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [5] Handling and pathology reporting of prostate biopsies
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    van der Kwast, TH
    Montironi, R
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Bono, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 46 (02) : 177 - 181
  • [6] Danacioglu Yavuz Onur, 2023, Prague Med Rep, V124, P40, DOI 10.14712/23362936.2023.4
  • [7] Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparison of Random and Targeted Biopsies
    Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry
    Peyromaure, Michael
    Schull, Alexandre
    Beuvon, Frederic
    Bouazza, Naim
    Flam, Thierry
    Zerbib, Marc
    Muradyan, Naira
    Legman, Paul
    Cornud, Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (02) : 493 - 499
  • [8] Comparison of Targeted vs Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men Who Are Biopsy Naive: The Prospective Assessment of Image Registration in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PAIREDCAP) Study
    Elkhoury, Fuad F.
    Felker, Ely R.
    Kwan, Lorna
    Sisk, Anthony E.
    Delfin, Merdie
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Marks, Leonard S.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2019, 154 (09) : 811 - 818
  • [9] The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Egevad, Lars
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Delahunt, Brett
    Srigley, John R.
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [10] Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Martignoni, Guido
    Novella, Giovanni
    Cerruto, Maria Angela
    Galfano, Antonio
    Novara, Giacomo
    Pea, Maurizio
    Artibani, Walter
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (02) : 266 - 271