Ecological footprint and human well-being nexus: accounting for broad-based financial development, globalization, and natural resources in the Next-11 countries

被引:0
作者
Solomon Prince Nathaniel
机构
[1] University of Lagos,Department of Economics
[2] Lagos State University,School of Foundation
来源
Future Business Journal | / 7卷
关键词
Human well-being; Globalization; Ecological footprint; Financial development; Sustainable development; AMG;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Next-11 (N11) countries have witnessed great advancements in economic activities in the past few years. However, the simultaneous attainment of environmental sustainability and improved human well-being has remained elusive. This study probes into ecological footprint (EF) and human well-being nexus in N11 countries by applying advanced estimation techniques compatible with heterogeneity, endogeneity, and cross-sectional dependence across country groups. From the findings, human well-being, captured by the human development index, increases the EF, and EF also increases human well-being which suggests a strong trade-off between both indicators. This shows that policies that are channeled toward promoting human well-being are not in consonance with environmental wellness. Financial development and biocapacity increase the EF, while natural resources and globalization reduce it. Human well-being increases the EF in all the countries except in Egypt. This study argues that strong institutions could help mitigate the trade-offs and ease the simultaneous attainment of both environmental preservation and improved human well-being. The limitations of the study, as well as, possible directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 212 条
[51]  
Cheng Z(2020)Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies J Clean Prod 67 101660-undefined
[52]  
Li L(2020)Natural resource abundance and financial development: a case study of emerging seven (E− 7) economies Resour Policy 188 144-undefined
[53]  
Liu J(2018)A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries J Clean Prod 743 140741-undefined
[54]  
Costanza R(2020)Biomass energy production and its impacts on the ecological footprint: an investigation of the G7 countries Sci Total Environ 69 709-undefined
[55]  
Kubiszewski I(2007)Error correction based panel cointegration tests Oxf Bull Econ Stat 147 621-undefined
[56]  
Giovannini E(2020)Catechizing the environmental-impression of urbanization, financial development, and political institutions: a circumstance of ecological footprints in 110 developed and less-developed countries Soc Indic Res 63 101428-undefined
[57]  
Lovins H(2019)The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States Resour Policy 62 427-undefined
[58]  
McGlade J(2019)The role of stock market and banking sector development, and renewable energy consumption in carbon emissions: insights from G-7 and N-11 countries Resour Policy 228 533-undefined
[59]  
Pickett KE(2019)Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries J Clean Prod 774 145553-undefined
[60]  
Ragnarsdóttir KV(2021)Caring for the environment: how human capital, natural resources, and economic growth interact with environmental degradation in Pakistan? A dynamic ARDL approach Sci Total Environ 96 102086-undefined