Ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

被引:12
作者
Chassé M. [1 ]
Glen P. [1 ]
Doyle M.A. [1 ]
McIntyre L. [1 ]
English S.W. [1 ]
Knoll G. [1 ]
Lizé J.F. [1 ]
Shemie S.D. [1 ]
Martin C. [1 ]
Turgeon A.F. [1 ]
Lauzier F. [1 ]
Fergusson D.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Single Photon Emission Compute Tomography; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Brain Death; Compute Tomography Perfusion; Radionuclide Imaging;
D O I
10.1186/2046-4053-2-100
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The essential clinical diagnostic components of brain death must include evidence for an established etiology capable of causing brain death, two independent clinical confirmations of the absence of all brainstem reflexes and an apnea test, and exclude confounders that can mimic brain death. Numerous confounders can render the clinical neurological determination of death (NDD) virtually impossible. As such, clinicians must rely on additional ancillary testing. We will conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis of ancillary testing for the neurological determination of death. The primary objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the accuracy of these ancillary tests compared to the three accepted reference standards: (1) clinical diagnosis, (2) four-vessel angiography and (3) radionuclide imaging. This objective will be investigated using two different populations with different baseline risks of brain death: comatose patients and patients with a neurological determination of death. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central databases for retrospective and prospective diagnostic test studies and interventional studies. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using QUADAS-2, which is used to assess the quality of diagnostic tests. If pooling is appropriate, we will compute parameter estimates using a bivariate model to produce summary receiver operating curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence regions around the summary operating point. Clinical and methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity. The results of this project will provide a critical evidence base for the neurological determination of death. The results will help clinicians to select ancillary tests based on the best available evidence. Our systematic review will also identify the strengths and weaknesses in the current evidence for the use of ancillary tests in diagnosing brain death. It will serve as a foundation for further research and the development of prospective studies on currently used or novel techniques for NDD. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42013005907.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Robertson JA(1999)The dead donor rule Hastings Cent Rep 29 6-14
[2]  
Beaulieu M-A(1999)Guidelines for the diagnosis of brain death. Canadian Neurocritical Care Group Can J Neurol Sci 26 64-66
[3]  
Seshia S(2008)A review of ancillary tests in evaluating brain death Can J Neurol Sci 35 409-419
[4]  
Teitelbaum J(2006)Severe brain injury to neurological determination of death: Canadian forum recommendations CMAJ 174 S1-13
[5]  
Young B(2008)Brain blood flow in the neurological determination of death: Canadian expert report Can J Neurol Sci 35 140-145
[6]  
Heran MKS(2006)Brief review: the role of ancillary tests in the neurological determination of death Can J Anaesth 53 620-627
[7]  
Heran NS(2008)Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions Neurology 70 284-289
[8]  
Shemie SD(2006)Variability in hospital-based brain death guidelines in Canada Can J Anaesth 53 613-619
[9]  
Shemie SD(2010)Should ancillary brain blood flow analyses play a larger role in the neurological determination of death? Can J Anaesth 57 927-935
[10]  
Doig C(2010)Challenges in diagnosing brain death Can J Anaesth 57 882-887