Muscle and bone dose in paediatric limb digital radiography: a Monte Carlo evaluation

被引:0
作者
Yuri V. Matyagin
Donald W. McRobbie
机构
[1] Royal Adelaide Hospital,South Australia Medical Imaging
[2] Flinders Medical Centre,South Australia Medical Imaging
[3] University of Adelaide,School of Physical Sciences
来源
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine | 2020年 / 43卷
关键词
Digital radiography; Exposure factors; Paediatric; Radiation dose; Extremities; Bone; Contrast-to-noise ratio; Image quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The proliferation of digital radiography (DR) has led to a re-evaluation of exposure parameters and image quality. Currently, there is a move towards reducing X-ray tube voltage (kVp) in paediatric exposures down to 40 kVp to achieve better images. However, the effect on patient dose of these modifications is uncertain. The main aims of this phantom study were to evaluate the effect of reducing the kVp in paediatric limb DR exposures on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and patient dose. For this purpose, Monte Carlo simulations of radiographic exposures on a paediatric limb phantom were performed. The phantom included muscle tissue and bone segments of five different densities in the range of 1.12 to 1.48 g/cm3. The overall thickness of the phantom varied between 1 and 12 cm. Dependence of the CNR at constant limb phantom muscle and bone doses and dependence of the CNR per unit of muscle and bone dose at constant detector dose on radiographic exposure factors and limb thickness were calculated. X-ray tube current-time product (mAs) values required to achieve equal detector dose versus limb thickness for different kVp were calculated, as well as muscle and bone doses for the limb phantom of varying thickness. Present work has shown that reducing the kVp in paediatric radiography of the extremities can result in a significant increase in radiation dose, particularly for thicker limbs. Low kVp radiography requires justification for use on the extremities.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 92
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Pearce MS(2012)Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study Lancet 380 499-505
  • [2] Salotti JA(2013)Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians Br Med J 346 f2360-W131
  • [3] Little MP(2015)Radiographic techniques, contrast, and noise in X-ray imaging Am J Roentgenol 204 W126-201
  • [4] McHugh K(2014)A paediatric X-ray exposure chart J Med Radiat Sci 61 191-179
  • [5] Lee C(2017)Investigation of noise sources for digital radiography systems Radiol Phys Technol 10 171-498
  • [6] Kim KP(2008)Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics Clinical Radiol 63 487-S182
  • [7] Mathews JD(2004)Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography Pediatr Radiol 34 S173-89
  • [8] Forsythe AV(2012)Best practices in digital radiography Radiol Technol 84 83-67
  • [9] Brady Z(2006)Pediatric upper extremity injuries Pediatr Clin N Am 53 41-649
  • [10] Butler MW(2012)Optimizing image quality and dose for digital radiography of distal pediatric extremities using the contrast-to-noise ratio Rofo 184 643-498