Modeling the dynamics of the retentivity process of journals among the most authoritative scientific serials

被引:0
作者
A. N. Libkind
V. A. Markusova
I. A. Libkind
M. Jansz
K. N. Ivanov
机构
[1] department of VINITI RAS,
[2] department of VINITI RAS,undefined
[3] Finacial University under the Government of the Russian Federation,undefined
[4] Technology Foundation STW,undefined
[5] Finacial University under the Government of the Russian Federation,undefined
关键词
lists of journals; impact factor; journal output; Journal Citation Reports; journals retention process; mathematical model;
D O I
10.3103/S0005105513030011
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The article examines the process of journal retention over time as the most authoritative sources of scientific papers. Formal concepts of retentivity are introduced, retentivity orders and retentivity directions. The postulates, which are formulated in the article, link the probability of retention to the time interval between the two compared journal lists, to the ratio of the sizes of these lists, as well as to some qualitative characteristics of the journals. A mathematical model of the retentivity process is built on the basis of these postulates. The model is compared with data from the Journal Citation Reports—Science Edition for a 16-year period. The results of this comparison show a high degree of conformity of the model to the real process of retentivity, and reveal important features of this process.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 92
页数:23
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Johnstone MJ(2007)Journal impact factors: implications for the nursing profession Int. Nursing Rev. 54 35-40
  • [2] Braun T(2006)A Hirschtype index for journals Scientometrics 69 169-173
  • [3] Glanzel W(2006)On the h-index-a mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact Scientometrics 67 121-129
  • [4] Schubert A(2012)The growth of science and database coverage Scientometrics 93 831-846
  • [5] Glanzel W(2012)Quality of scientific journals and base criterions for including to information system Web of Science of Thomson Reuters Co. Acta Naturae 4 6-13
  • [6] Michels C(1985)One approach to study communication in science Scientometrics 8 217-231
  • [7] Schmoch U(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [8] Markusova VA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [9] Libkind AN(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined