Examination of the Effect of Preference for Solitude on Subjective Well-Being and Developmental Change

被引:0
作者
Aya Toyoshima
Shinichi Sato
机构
[1] Osaka University,
来源
Journal of Adult Development | 2019年 / 26卷
关键词
Preference for solitude; Social interaction; Subjective well-being; Life satisfaction; Spending time alone; Adolescence; Older adults; Middle-aged adults;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined the associations of preference for solitude (PS) and social interactions with subjective well-being in three age groups: younger, middle-aged, and older adults. We conducted an Internet questionnaire survey of 1500 people: 500 younger adults (aged 29–31), 500 middle-aged adults (aged 49–51), and 500 older adults (aged 69–71). The questionnaire incorporated scales measuring PS, social interactions, and subjective well-being. The results of a multiple regression analysis, with positive affect as the dependent variable, showed that the interaction term, interacting with friends and PS in older adults, had a significant effect. Thus, interacting with friends was associated with higher positive affect among older adults who reported lower or average PS scores. However, among those with a higher PS scores, the effect of interacting with friends was relatively weak, in comparison to other groups. Moreover, the interaction between spending time alone and PS was significant for all age groups. Particularly, among older adults who frequently spent time alone, those who reported a higher PS tended to have higher positive affect than the other participants. Thus, when older adults preferred solitude, having little social interaction did not appear to inhibit their subjective well-being. However, PS was related to low levels of life satisfaction in all age groups. The results of this study suggest that spending time alone actually enhances positive affect; this partially explains how older adults adapt to their diminishing social networks.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 148
页数:9
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Bates AP(1964)Privacy—A useful concept? Social Forces 42 429-434
[2]  
Burger JM(1995)Individual differences in preference for solitude Journal of Research in Personality 29 85-108
[3]  
Carstensen LL(1991)Selectivity theory: Social activity in life-span context Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics 11 195-217
[4]  
Chipperfield JG(1999)Primary and secondary control-enhancing strategies: Implications for health in later life Journal of Aging and Health 11 517-539
[5]  
Perry RP(1995)Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 851-864
[6]  
Menec VH(2003)Loneliness in everyday life: Cardiovascular activity, psychosocial context, and health behaviors Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 105-120
[7]  
Diener E(1993)Optimisation by selection and compensation: Balancing primary and secondary control in life span development International Journal of Behavioral Development 16 287-303
[8]  
Diener M(1995)A life-span theory of control Psychological Review 102 284-304
[9]  
Diener C(2010)A motivational theory of life-span development Psychological Review 117 32-60
[10]  
Hawkley LC(2006)The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review Clinical Psychology Review 26 695-718