Risk-based educational accountability in Dutch primary education

被引:0
作者
A. C. Timmermans
I. F. de Wolf
R. J. Bosker
S. Doolaard
机构
[1] University of Groningen,GION Education/Research
[2] Dutch Inspectorate of Education,undefined
来源
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | 2015年 / 27卷
关键词
Educational accountability; Risk assessment; Primary education; Value added;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A recent development in educational accountability is a risk-based approach, in which intensity and frequency of school inspections vary across schools to make educational accountability more efficient and effective by enabling inspectorates to focus on organizations at risk. Characteristics relevant in predicting which schools are “at risk on adverse effects” and robustness of results of risk-based analyses over multiple cohorts were assessed by an empirical analysis of Dutch primary schools. Adverse effects were defined as below average final achievement and/or below average value added. School composition, previous underperformance, insufficient judgments on having a systematic evaluation approach, evaluation of support, and monitoring student performance appeared as factors related to subsequent underperformance of schools. Although a rich set of possible risk factors was available, further investigation of a large number of schools is required in order to find nearly all underperforming schools. However, a group of about 40 % of the schools showed very small risk on underperformance, which represents the efficiency gain when risk-based school accountability would be applied. Furthermore, whether schools are (in)accurately classified in the risk analysis as “at-risk” schools depends heavily on the chosen caesura.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 346
页数:23
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
De Jong P(2012)The health impact of mandatory bicycle helmet laws Risk Analysis 32 782-790
[2]  
De Wolf I(2011)Evaluatie van de theorie en praktijk van het nieuwe onderwijstoezicht Tijdschrift voor Toezicht 2 7-24
[3]  
Verkroost JJH(2006)Value‐added is of little value Journal of Education Policy 21 235-243
[4]  
Gorard S(2008)The value‐added of primary schools: what is it really measuring? Educational Review 60 179-185
[5]  
Gorard S(2009)School effects on students’ progress—a dynamic perspective School Effectiveness and School Improvement 20 255-268
[6]  
Guldemond H(2011)A value model for evaluating Homeland Security decisions Risk Analysis 31 1470-1487
[7]  
Bosker RJ(2010)Value-added measures for schools in England: looking inside the ‘black box’ of complex metrics Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 22 181-198
[8]  
Keeney RL(2009)The limitations of using school league tables to inform school choice Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 172 835-851
[9]  
von Winterfeldt D(2007)Validity of inferences from test-based educational accountability systems Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 31 35-62
[10]  
Kelly A(2006)Distorting value added: the use of longitudinal, vertically scaled student achievement data for growth-based, value-added accountability Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 43 103-121