A comprehensive study on battery electric modeling approaches based on machine learning

被引:1
作者
Heinrich F. [1 ]
Klapper P. [1 ]
Pruckner M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Group Innovation, Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg
[2] Energy Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
关键词
Battery modeling; In-vehicle; Machine learning; Neural networks; Regression methods;
D O I
10.1186/s42162-021-00171-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Battery electric modeling is a central aspect to improve the battery development process as well as to monitor battery system behavior. Besides conventional physical models, machine learning methods show great potential to learn this task using in-vehicle data. However, the performance of data-driven approaches differs significantly depending on their application and utilized data set. Hence, a comparison among these methods is required beforehand to select the optimal candidate for a given task.In this work, we address this problem and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a wide range of possible machine learning approaches for battery electric modeling. In a comprehensive study, various conventional regression methods and neural networks are analyzed. Each method is trained and optimized based on a large and qualitative data set of automotive driving profiles. In order to account for the influence of time-dependent battery processes, both low pass filters and sliding window approaches are investigated.As a result, neural networks are found to be superior compared to conventional regression methods in terms of accuracy and model complexity. In particular, Feedforward and Convolutional Neural Networks provide the smallest average error deviations of around 0.16%, which corresponds to an RMSE of 5.57mV on battery cell level. With automotive time series data as focus, neural networks additionally benefit from their ability to learn continuously. This key capability keeps the battery models updated at low computational costs and accounts for changing electrical behavior as the battery ages during operation. © 2021, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Andersson M., Johansson M., Klass V.L., A continuous-time LPV model for battery state-of-health estimation using real vehicle data, In: 2020 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), pp. 692-698, (2020)
[2]  
Breiman L., Friedman J.H., Stone C.J., Olshen R.A., Classification and Regression Trees, (1984)
[3]  
Chandran V., K Patil C., Karthick A., Ganeshaperumal D., Rahim R., Ghosh A., State of charge estimation of lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles using machine learning algorithms, World Electr Veh J, 12, 1, (2021)
[4]  
Choi W., Shin H.-C., Kim J.M., Choi J.-Y., Yoon W.-S., Modeling and applications of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) for lithium-ion batteries, J Electrochem Sci Technol, 11, 1, pp. 1-13, (2020)
[5]  
Chollet F., Keras., (2015)
[6]  
Drucker H., Improving regressors using boosting techniques, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML ’97, pp. 107-115, (1997)
[7]  
Friedman J.H., Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine, Ann Stat, 29, pp. 1189-1232, (2000)
[8]  
Goodfellow I., Bengio Y., Courville A., Deep Learning, (2017)
[9]  
Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J., The Elements of Statistical Learning - Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, (2009)
[10]  
Heinrich F., Lehmann T., Jonas K., Pruckner M., Data Driven Approach for Battery State Estimation Based on Neural Networks, pp. 197-212, (2021)