Visualizing the in-vivo application of zinc in sensitive skin using reflectance confocal microscopy

被引:0
作者
Hye-Jin Ahn
Hae Jin Kim
Hyein Ham
Ji Hwoon Baek
Young Lee
Mahin Alamgir
Babar Rao
Min Kyung Shin
机构
[1] Kyung Hee University,Department of Medicine, Graduate School
[2] Kyung Hee University Medical Center,Department of Dermatology
[3] DERMAPRO Ltd,Dermapro Skin Research Center
[4] Chungnam National University,Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine
[5] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School,Department of Dermatology
[6] Department of Dermatology,Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine
[7] Weill Cornell Medical Center,undefined
[8] Kyung Hee University,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 11卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Findings obtained on objective assessments to evaluate sensitive skin do not correlate well with the symptomatology. We utilized reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) to compare transepidermal application of zinc in sensitive and non-sensitive skin. Thirty-six subjects participated in this study. They were divided into groups based on lactic acid sting test (LAST):‘stinger’ and ‘non-stinger’; transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements; and sensitivity self-assessments: ‘sensitive’ and ‘non-sensitive’. RCM images were taken to visualize transepidermal application of topically-applied zinc. The intensity of zinc reflectance at different depths was measured by ImageJ software. Based on LAST scores, the ‘stinger’ group showed significantly higher reflectance of zinc at 8 µm (stratum corneum) [face (P < 0.001), forearm (P = 0.004)], and at 80–104 µm (dermo-epidermal junction layer) on the face. High-TEWL group showed increased zinc reflectance at 8–24 µm (tight junction layer, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences amongst subjects self-reporting ‘sensitive’ and ‘non-sensitive’ skin. RCM demonstrates that in sensitive skin, there is deeper and higher reflectance of zinc at multiple depths. Structural differences are also visualized. We suggest that RCM is a useful tool for evaluating skin barrier integrity.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 135 条
  • [1] Misery L(2017)Definition of sensitive skin: an expert position paper from the special interest group on sensitive skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch Acta Derm. Venereol. 97 4-6
  • [2] Ständer S(2002)Intra- and inter-individual differences in sensitive skin Cosmet. Toiletries. 117 39-46
  • [3] Szepietowski JC(2007)Comparison and correlation between stinging responses to lactic acid and bioengineering parameters Contact Dermatitis 57 158-162
  • [4] Reich A(2016)Clinical, biophysical and immunohistochemical analysis of skin reactions to acute skin barrier disruption: a comparative trial between subjects with sensitive skin and subjects with non-sensitive skin Br. J. Dermatol. 174 1126-1133
  • [5] Wallengren J(2006)Stratum corneum cytokines and skin irritation response to sodium lauryl sulfate Contact Dermatitis 54 325-333
  • [6] Evers AW(2006)Sensory, clinical and physiological factors in sensitive skin: a review Contact Dermatitis 55 1-14
  • [7] Distante F(2001)Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study Br. J. Dermatol. 145 258-263
  • [8] Rigano L(2018)Sensitive skin in Korean population: an epidemiological approach Skin Res. Technol. 24 229-234
  • [9] D’Agostino R(2015)Characterization of atopic skin and the effect of a hyperforin-rich cream by laser scanning microscopy J. Biomed. Opt. 20 051013-318
  • [10] Bonfigli A(2016)Pathophysiological study of sensitive skin Acta Derm. Venereol. 96 314-637