The male perineal sling—a viable alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter

被引：0

作者：

Craig V Comiter

机构：

[1] Associate Professor of Surgery and Urology,

[2] and Chief of the Section of Urology at the University of Arizona Health Sciences Center,undefined

来源：

Nature Clinical Practice Urology | 2006年 / 3卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This Viewpoint provides a timely review of the current status of surgical treatments for men who develop stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. The author discusses the safety and efficacy of the bone-anchored perineal sling, a procedure that has recently undergone several modifications and is arguably emerging as a viable alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter.

引用

页码：118 / 119

页数：1

共 13 条

[1] Stanford JL(2000)Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study JAMA 283 354-360
[2] Comiter CV(2005)The male perineal sling: intermediate-term results Neurourol Urodyn 24 648-653
[3] Dikranian AH(2004)The male perineal sling: comparison of sling materials J Urol 172 608-610
[4] Madjar S(2001)Bone anchored sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence J Urol 165 72-76
[5] Rajpurkar AD(2005)Patient satisfaction and clinical efficacy of the new perineal bone-anchored male sling Eur Urol 47 237-242
[6] Elliott DS(1998)Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases J Urol 159 1206-1208
[7] Barrett DM(2000)The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters J Urol 164 702-706
[8] Venn SN(2000)Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: the case for artificial urinary sphincter implantation Urology 55 2-4
[9] Montague DK(2004)The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: urodynamic and subjective assessment J Urol 172 204-206
[10] Angermeier KW(2005)The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: mean followup of 18 months J Urol 173 1657-1660

← 1 2 →