Islamic Considerations on the Application of Patient’s Autonomy in End-of-Life Decision

被引:0
作者
Mohammad Mustaqim Malek
Noor Naemah Abdul Rahman
Mohd Shahnaz Hasan
Luqman Haji Abdullah
机构
[1] University of Malaya,Department of Fiqh and Usul, Academy of Islamic Studies
[2] University of Malaya,Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine
[3] Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia,Centre for Science and Environment Studies
来源
Journal of Religion and Health | 2018年 / 57卷
关键词
Islam; End of life; Advance medical directive; Euthanasia; Do-not-resuscitate; Mercy killing; Physician-assisted suicide;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In end-of-life situation, the need for patient’s preference comes into the picture with the intention of guiding physicians in the direction of patient care. Preference in medical directive is made by a person with full mental capacity outlining what actions should be taken for his health should he loses his competency. This is based on the reality of universal paradigm in medical practice that emphasises patient’s autonomy. A specific directive is produced according to a patient’s wish that might include some ethically and religiously controversial directives such as mercy killing, physician-assisted suicide, forgoing life-supporting treatments and do-not-resuscitate. In the future, patient autonomy is expected to become prevalent. The extent of patient autonomy has not been widely discussed among Muslim scholars. In Islam, there are certain considerations that must be adhered to.
引用
收藏
页码:1524 / 1537
页数:13
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]  
Abdullah O(2011)Filial piety in Confucianism and Islam: a comparative literary analysis of Qur’an, hadith, and four Chinese classics Islam and Civilisational Renewal 3 133-153
[2]  
Shukri ASM(2013)Advance medical directives: A proposed new approach and terminology from an Islamic perspective Medical Health Care and Philosophy 16 163-169
[3]  
Othman N(2017)Ethical dilemmas at the end of life: Islamic perspective Journal of Religion and Health 56 400-410
[4]  
Abdullah H(2013)To be involved or not to be involved: a survey of public preferences for self-involvement in decision-making involving mental capacity (competency) within Europe Palliative Medicine 27 418-427
[5]  
Baharoon S(2007)Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations Health Expectations 10 248-258
[6]  
Al Sayyari A(2012)Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice Journal of General Internal Medicine 27 1361-1367
[7]  
Al-Ahmad G(2010)Supporting patient autonomy: The importance of clinician-patient relationships Journal of General Internal Medicine 25 741-745
[8]  
Chamsi-Pasha H(2016)Religious, ethical and legal considerations in end-of-life issues: Fundamental requisites for medical decision making Journal of Religion and Health 55 119-134
[9]  
Albar MA(2012)Outstanding ethico-legal-fiqhi issues Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences 7 5-12
[10]  
Daveson BA(2002)Medical paternalism serves the patient best Singapore Medical Journal 43 143-147