CT, MR, US, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

被引:0
作者
Dae Young Yoon
Hee Sung Hwang
Suk Ki Chang
Young-Soo Rho
Hwoe Young Ahn
Jin Hwan Kim
In Jae Lee
机构
[1] Kangdong Seong-Sim Hospital,Department of Radiology
[2] Hallym University College of Medicine,Department of Nuclear Medicine
[3] Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital,Department of Otorhinolaryngology
[4] Hallym University College of Medicine,Department of Radiology
[5] Kangdong Seong-Sim Hospital,undefined
[6] Hallym University College of Medicine,undefined
[7] Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital,undefined
[8] Hallym University College of Medicine,undefined
来源
European Radiology | 2009年 / 19卷
关键词
Head and neck; Lymph node metastases; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasonography; Positron emission tomography/computed tomography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of four different imaging methods—computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, ultrasonography (US), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT—and their combined use for preoperative detection of cervical nodal metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Sixty-seven patients (58 men and 9 women; mean age, 60.1 years) with head and neck SCCs underwent CT, MR, US, and PET/CT before surgery. First, each study was reviewed separately for the presence of nodal metastases. Then, the value of combined images was assessed based on a confidence rating score for each modality assigned by observers. These results were verified, on a level-by-level basis, with histopathologic findings. Histopathologic examination revealed nodal metastases in 74 of 402 nodal levels. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 77.0%, 99.4%, and 95.3% for CT and MR; 78.4%, 98.5%, and 94.8% for US; and 81.1%, 98.2%, and 95.0% for PET/CT, respectively. The comparison of these modalities showed no statistically significant difference among them (p > 0.05). The combination of CT, MR, US, and PET/CT improved sensitivity (86.5%), without loss of specificity (99.4%) and accuracy (97.0%), although the difference failed to reach statistical significance.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 642
页数:8
相关论文
共 147 条
  • [1] Parker SL(1996)Cancer statistics 1996 CA Cancer J Clin 46 5-27
  • [2] Tong T(1993)Head and neck cancer N Engl J Med 328 184-194
  • [3] Bolden S(1992)Management of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 249 187-194
  • [4] Vokes EE(2005)The influence of lymph node metastasis in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx: N0 versus N +  Laryngoscope 115 629-639
  • [5] Weichselbaum RR(1998)Prospective comparison of Eur J Nucl Med 25 1255-1260
  • [6] Lippman SM(1995)F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MR imaging, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer J Nucl Med 36 211-216
  • [7] Snow GB(1995)Detection of lymph node metastases of squamous-cell cancer of the head and neck with FDG-PET and MR imaging J Nucl Med 36 1747-1757
  • [8] Patel P(2004)Comparison of fluorine-18-fluorode-oxyglucose PET, MR imaging and endoscopy for staging head and neck squamous-cell carcinomas Radiology 231 65-72
  • [9] Leemans CR(2000)Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion AJR 174 837-844
  • [10] Tiwari R(2000)Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy Radiol Clin North Am 38 979-998