Explaining Ethnic Differences in Late Antenatal Care Entry by Predisposing, Enabling and Need Factors in the Netherlands. The Generation R Study

被引:0
作者
A. A. Choté
G. T. Koopmans
W. K. Redekop
C. J. M. de Groot
R. J. Hoefman
V. W. V. Jaddoe
A. Hofman
E. A. P. Steegers
J. P. Mackenbach
M. Trappenburg
M. Foets
机构
[1] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Department of Health Policy and Management
[2] Erasmus MC,The Generation R Study Group
[3] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Institute for Medical Technology Assessment
[4] Erasmus MC,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
[5] Erasmus MC,Department of Epidemiology
[6] Erasmus MC,Department of Pediatrics
[7] Erasmus MC,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
[8] Erasmus MC,Department of Public Health
[9] Utrecht University,undefined
[10] The Medical Centre,undefined
来源
Maternal and Child Health Journal | 2011年 / 15卷
关键词
Ethnicity; Antenatal care; Late entry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite compulsory health insurance in Europe, ethnic differences in access to health care exist. The objective of this study is to investigate how ethnic differences between Dutch and non-Dutch women with respect to late entry into antenatal care provided by community midwifes can be explained by need, predisposing and enabling factors. Data were obtained from the Generation R Study. The Generation R Study is a multi-ethnic population-based prospective cohort study conducted in the city of Rotterdam. In total, 2,093 pregnant women with a Dutch, Moroccan, Turkish, Cape Verdean, Antillean, Surinamese Creole and Surinamese Hindustani background were included in this study. We examined whether ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry could be explained by need, predisposing and enabling factors. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent role of explanatory variables in the timing of antenatal care entry. The main outcome measure was late entry into antenatal care (gestational age at first visit after 14 weeks). With the exception of Surinamese-Hindustani women, the percentage of mothers entering antenatal care late was higher in all non-Dutch compared to Dutch mothers. We could explain differences between Turkish (OR = 0.95, CI: 0.57–1.58), Cape Verdean (OR = 1.65. CI: 0.96–2.82) and Dutch women. Other differences diminished but remained significant (Moroccan: OR = 1,74, CI: 1.07–2.85; Dutch Antillean OR 1.80, CI: 1.04–3.13). We found that non-Dutch mothers were more likely to enter antenatal care later than Dutch mothers. Because we are unable to explain fully the differences regarding Moroccan, Surinamese-Creole and Antillean women, future research should focus on differences between 1st and 2nd generation migrants, as well as on language barriers that may hinder access to adequate information about the Dutch obstetric system.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 699
页数:10
相关论文
共 124 条
  • [31] van der Waal MF(2010)Medicaid and preterm birth and low birth weight: The last two decades Journal of Women’s Health 19 1-212
  • [32] Bonsel GJ(2006)The basis of the Dutch obstetric system: Risk selection European Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2 209-484
  • [33] Park J-H(2006)The Generation R study: Design and cohort profile European Journal of Epidemiology 21 475-811
  • [34] Vincent D(2008)The Generation R study: design and cohort update until the age of 4 years European Journal of Epidemiology 23 801-88
  • [35] Hastings-Tolsma M(2002)Preconception care: A systematic review Maternal and Child Health Journal 6 75-60
  • [36] Ny P(2002)The past and present practices and continuing controversies of preconception care Community Genet 5 50-S236
  • [37] Dykes AK(2009)Health care Quality-improvement appoaches to reducing child health disparities Pediatrics 124 S224-undefined
  • [38] Molin J(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [39] Dejin-Karlsson E(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [40] Jeong-Hwang JH(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined