Influence of magnetic interactions on the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility: the case of single domain particles packed in globule aggregates

被引:0
作者
Gregory Fanjat
Valera Shcherbakov
Pierre Camps
机构
[1] CNRS and Université Montpellier 2,Gosciences Montpellier
[2] Borok Geophysical Observatory,undefined
来源
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica | 2012年 / 56卷
关键词
magnetic fabrics; magnetic susceptibility; anisotropy; magnetic interactions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The influence of magnetic interactions on the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) have been largely studied by several theoretical models or experiments. Numerical models have shown that when magnetostatic interactions occur, the distributions of particles over the volume rather than their individual orientations control the AMS. We have shown recently from a comprehensive rock magnetic study and from a theoretical 2-dimensional (2-D) model that single domain particles closely packed in globule aggregates could produce strong local random interaction magnetic fields which could influence the magnetic susceptibility and decrease the degree of anisotropy. In this paper, we first present in detail this 2-D theoretical model and then we extend it to the 3-D case. The possible distribution function of the magnetostatic interaction fields comprises two extreme states: it is either isotropic or ordered. The former case corresponds to the thermal-demagnetized state while the second case corresponds to the alternating field (AF) demagnetized state. We show that when easy axes of magnetization are not uniformly distributed, the degree of anisotropy decreases as the interaction field increases in both AF- and thermal-demagnetized states in 2-D and 3-D geometry. Thus we conclude that random magnetic fields generated by a random arrangement of magnetic particles over the sample volume decrease the degree of anisotropy of AMS and may alter the magnetic fabric.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 768
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Bascou J.(2005)Magnetic versus crystallographic fabrics in a basaltic lava flow J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 145 119-135
  • [2] Camps P.(2000)Anisotropie de susceptibilité magnétique et fabriques des granites (Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy and fabrics in granites) Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences — Series IIA — Earth and Planetary Science 330 1-14
  • [3] Dautria J.M.(1996)Single-grain distribution anisotropy: A simple three-dimensional model Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 94 117-131
  • [4] Bouchez J.L.(2001)Factors affecting the relative importance of shape and distribution anisotropy in rocks: Theory and experiments Tectonophysics 340 117-131
  • [5] Cañón-Tapia E.(2006)Theoretical aspects of dipolar interactions and their appearance in first-order reversal curves thermally activated J. Ceophys. Res. 111 B12517-832
  • [6] Cañón-Tapia E.(2006)Theoretical considerations on the anhysteretic remanent magnetization of interacting particles with uniaxial anisotroipy J. Geophys. Res. 111 Bl2S18-19
  • [7] Egli R.(2012)Magnetic interactions at the origin of abnormal magnetic fabrics in lava flows: a case study from Kerguelen flood basalts Geophys. J. Int. 189 815-2768
  • [8] Egli R.(2006)Effects of magnetic interactions in anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility: Models, experiments and implications for igneous rock fabrics quantification Tectonophysics 418 3-944
  • [9] Fanjat G.(1995)Shape anisotropy versus magnetic interactions of magnetite grains: Experiments and application to AMS in granitic rocks Geophys. Res. Lett. 22 2765-2196
  • [10] Camps P.(1998)Magnetite grain fabric and distribution anisotropy vs. rock magnetic fabric a three-dimensional case study J. Struct. Geol. 20 937-20