The management of osteoporosis following hip fracture: Have we improved our care?

被引:0
作者
Sachin Bahl
Penelope S. Coates
Susan L. Greenspan
机构
[1] University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine
[2] Shadyside Hospital,Osteoporosis Prevention and Treatment Center, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine
[3] University of Pittsburgh,undefined
来源
Osteoporosis International | 2003年 / 14卷
关键词
Hip fracture; Osteoporosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To determine if physicians have improved the recognition and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with an acute hip fracture, we performed a retrospective analysis of discharge data from 1995 and 2000 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, a large tertiary care, academic institution. We examined patients admitted with an acute hip fracture in 1995 and 2000 and age- and sex-matched patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia in 2000. Outcomes included age, gender, race, discharge diagnoses (from ICD-9 codes) and discharge medications (from discharge summaries) in all patients. There were 136 acute hip fracture patients (mean age 73±18 years) in 1995, 117 acute hip fracture patients (mean age 76±16 years) in 2000 and 116 patients with community-acquired pneumonia (mean age 78±7 years). Patients admitted in 2000 with an acute hip fracture were more likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis (18% vs. 4%, P<0.02), more likely to be discharged on calcium (17% vs. 7%, P<0.02) and more likely to be discharged on antiresorptive therapy (15% vs. 2%, P<0.001) than those admitted in 1995. Moreover, patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia were just as likely to receive calcium, vitamin D or antiresorptive agents at the time of discharge as those with an acute hip fracture in 2000. Patients with a diagnosis of osteoporosis in 2000 were older and more likely to receive antiresorptive agents than those without a diagnosis (29% vs. 11%, P<0.05). None of the patients received a bone mineral density examination while in the hospital. Although there was an improvement in the management of osteoporosis after an acute hip fracture from 1995 to 2000, there was no difference in management of patients with hip fracture versus pneumonia in the year 2000. However, patients with a “diagnosis” of osteoporosis in 2000 were more likely to be discharged on appropriate therapeutic options. We conclude that although we have improved our care of osteoporosis for elderly in general from 1995 to 2000, patients with an acute hip fracture are not receiving any additional treatment unless they have a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Further studies are needed to determine which factors are needed to target patients for appropriate diagnosis and treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 888
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Cummings R(2002)Spine fracture risk is predicted by non-spine fracture Lancet 359 1761-5
  • [2] Consensus J(1993)undefined Am J Med 94 646-undefined
  • [3] Ray P(1997)undefined J Bone Miner Res 12 24-undefined
  • [4] Ribot undefined(1993)undefined Bone 14 S77-undefined
  • [5] Ross undefined(1993)undefined Osteoporos Int 3 120-undefined
  • [6] Wasnich undefined(1994)undefined Osteoporos Int 4 1-undefined
  • [7] Davis undefined(1995)undefined N Engl J Med 332 767-undefined
  • [8] Ross undefined(1996)undefined Am J Epidemiol 144 255-undefined
  • [9] Cummings undefined(2000)undefined J Bone Miner Res 15 721-undefined
  • [10] Nguyen undefined(2000)undefined Am J Med 109 324-undefined