Indicator system for the sustainability assessment of the German energy system and its transition

被引:0
作者
Christine Rösch
Klaus-Rainer Bräutigam
Jürgen Kopfmüller
Volker Stelzer
Patrick Lichtner
机构
[1] Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS),Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
来源
Energy, Sustainability and Society | / 7卷
关键词
Sustainability; Assessment; Indicators; Energy system; Energy transition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In response to climate change, the limited availability of fossil fuels and the risks associated with nuclear energy, Germany’s energy transition aims to achieve a sustainable, environmentally sound supply of energy services. A monitoring process was established by the Federal Government to ensure that the targets defined for the transformation will be reached. The indicator system developed for that purpose mainly focuses on “classical” environmental, economic and technological indicators for which statistical time series data and political targets are available. Important socio-technical aspects of the energy system and its transition, such as affordability, participation and acceptance, remain largely neglected. This paper aims to contribute to the discussion on indicators needed for political decision-making to appropriately address sustainability aspects of the energy system and its transition, as well as to contribute to improving existing indicator systems. Therefore, the sustainability rules of the Integrative Concept of Sustainable Development were translated into indicators based on an in-depth literature review. The resulting abundance of possible indicators was then reduced using selection criteria such as comprehensiveness, possibility to determine targets and availability of data. Finally, the indicator system was adjusted based on feedback of experts from different disciplines and stakeholder interviews in the particular investigation area of southwest Thuringia. Besides classical indicators related to techno-economic and environmental aspects, the finally developed indicator system includes new sustainability indicators related to the socio-technical interface of the energy system. Thus, it is considered suitable for assessing the sustainability of the Germany energy system and its transition in an integrative and comprehensive way. The indicator system is helpful to systematically identify strengths and weaknesses of the energy system and interdependencies and conflicts of goals between different sustainability aspects. All in all, we believe that applying the indicator system appropriately can support the development of resilient political strategies for a successful energy transition.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Tasaki T(2010)A survey of national sustainable development indicators International Journal of Sustainable Development 13 337-361
[2]  
Kameyama Y(2008)Bulding a `Theory of Sustainable Development`: two salient conceptions within the German discourse International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 7 465-482
[3]  
Hashimoto S(2004)Re-emphasizing sustainable development—the concept of `Evolutionability`. On Living Chances, Equity and Good Heritage Environment, Development and Sustainability 6 379-392
[4]  
Moriguchi Y(2009)Energy production from grassland—assessing the sustainability of different process chains under German conditions Biomass and Bioenergy 33 689-700
[5]  
Harasawa H(2001)Breaking through the glass ceiling: who really cares about sustainability indicators? Local Environment 6 291-309
[6]  
Schulz J(2014)Comparative risk assessment of severe accidents in the energy sector Energy Policy. 74 35-56
[7]  
Brand F(2014)Energiearmut – vom politischen Schlagwort zur handlungsleitenden Definition GAIA 23 14-18
[8]  
Kopfmüller J(2010)Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: results of a survey among European energy experts Energy Policy 38 1030-1039
[9]  
Ott K(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Keiner M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined