Revised FIGO staging system for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: important implications for radiologists

被引：0
作者：
Tsukasa Saida
Yumiko Oishi Tanaka
Koji Matsumoto
Toyomi Satoh
Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
Manabu Minami
机构：
[1] University of Tsukuba,Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine
[2] University of Tsukuba,Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine
[3] Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital,Obstetrics and Gynecology
来源：
Japanese Journal of Radiology | 2016年 / 34卷
关键词：
Staging; Ovarian cancer; Serous carcinoma; STIC;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer diagnosis among women worldwide. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics recently significantly revised staging criteria for cancer of the ovary. The latest revision was based on the concept that high-grade serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) may be the origin of some high-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary and peritoneum. Therefore, staging criteria for the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum have been unified. Understanding this background and other important revised points are essential for radiologists concerned with imaging diagnosis in gynecologic oncology. Through this review, we introduce the STIC theory and show examples of diseases in accordance with the new staging criteria based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) results.
引用
收藏
页码：117 / 124
页数：7
相关论文
共 118 条
  • [11] Benedet JL(1994)Early de novo ovarian carcinoma. A study of fourteen cases Cancer 73 1859-928
  • [12] Creasman WT(2004)Serous surface papillary carcinoma of the peritoneum: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 11 patients AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 923-S192
  • [13] Prat J(2006)Carcinoma of the ovary: FIGO 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer Int J Gynecol Obstet 95 S161-469
  • [14] Prat J(2008)Pathology of stage I versus stage III ovarian carcinoma with implications for pathogenesis and screening Int J Gynecol Cancer 18 465-1560
  • [15] Kurman RJ(1998)Patients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to stage III after systematic lymphadenctomy have similar survival to Stage I/II patients and superior survival to other Stage III patients Cancer 83 1555-241
  • [16] Shih IeM(1999)The validity and significance of substage IIIC by node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of nodal metastasis on patient survival Gynecol Oncol 73 237-566
  • [17] Lalwani N(2005)Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial J Natl Cancer Inst 97 560-801
  • [18] Prasad SR(2006)Is it justified to classify patients to Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer based on nodal involvement only? Gynecol Oncol 103 797-156
  • [19] Vikram R(2007)Ovarian cancer patients with “node-positive-only” Stage IIIC disease have a more favorable outcome than Stage IIIA/B Gynecol Oncol 107 154-228
  • [20] Shanbhogue AK(2008)Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer classified solely by lymph node metastasis has a more favorable prognosis than other types of stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer J Gynecol Oncol 19 223-2780
12345678910