How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design; [Wie man ein Mixed Methods-Forschungs-Design konstruiert]

被引：0

作者：

Schoonenboom J. ^{[1
]}

Johnson R.B. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Institut für Bildungswissenschaft, Universität Wien, Sensengasse 3a, Wien

[2] Department of Professional Studies, University of South Alabama, UCOM 3700, Mobile, 36688-0002, AL

来源：

KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie | 2017年 / 69卷 / Suppl 2期

关键词：

Design complexity; Methods of social research; Mixed methods; Mixed methods design; Mixing purpose; Point of integration; Qualitative methods; Quantitative methods; Research design; Timing of mixing;

D O I：

10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This article provides researchers with knowledge of how to design a high quality mixed methods research study. To design a mixed study, researchers must understand and carefully consider each of the dimensions of mixed methods design, and always keep an eye on the issue of validity. We explain the seven major design dimensions: purpose, theoretical drive, timing (simultaneity and dependency), point of integration, typological versus interactive design approaches, planned versus emergent design, and design complexity. There also are multiple secondary dimensions that need to be considered during the design process. We explain ten secondary dimensions of design to be considered for each research study. We also provide two case studies showing how the mixed designs were constructed. © 2017, The Author(s).

引用

页码：107 / 131

页数：24

共 30 条

[1]

Bazeley, Mosaics, triangles, and DNA: Metaphors for integrated analysis in mixed methods research, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6, pp. 55-72, (2012)

[2]

Bryman A., Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?, Qualitative Research, 6, pp. 97-113, (2006)

[3]

Cook T.D., Postpositivist critical multiplism, Social science and social policy, pp. 21-62, (1985)

[4]

Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L., Designing and conducting mixed methods research, (2011)

[5]

Erzberger C., Prein G., Triangulation: Validity and empirically-based hypothesis construction, Quality and Quantity, 31, pp. 141-154, (1997)

[6]

Greene J.C., Mixed methods in social inquiry, (2007)

[7]

Greene J.C., Preserving distinctions within the multimethod and mixed methods research merger, (2015)

[8]

Greene J.C., Valerie J., Caracelli, Graham W.F., Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, pp. 255-274, (1989)

[9]

Greene J.C., Hall J.N., Dialectics and pragmatism, SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, pp. 119-167, (2010)

[10]

Describing mixed methods research: An alternative to typologies, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7, pp. 141-151, (2013)

← 1 2 3 →