A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials

被引:0
作者
Adel El Feky
Katie Gillies
Heidi Gardner
Cynthia Fraser
Shaun Treweek
机构
[1] University of Aberdeen,Health Services Research Unit
来源
Systematic Reviews | / 7卷
关键词
Clinical trials; Non-randomised evaluations; Retention strategies; Drop-outs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Fewtrell MS(2008)How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Child 93 458-461
[2]  
Kennedy K(2004)Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals Clin Trials 1 368-376
[3]  
Singhal A(2017)Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme BMJ Open 7 e015276-674
[4]  
Martin RM(1999)What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials BMJ 319 670-1487
[5]  
Ness A(2015)Updated systematic review identifies substantial number of retention strategies: using more strategies retains more study participants J Clin Epidemiol 68 1481-765
[6]  
Hadders-Algra M(2007)Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants J Clin Epidemiol 60 757-cc42
[7]  
Wood AM(2013)Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12 Mr000032-676
[8]  
White IR(1999)Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies BMJ 319 312-1119
[9]  
Thompson SG(2009)The randomized controlled trial Nephron Clin Pract 113 c337-560
[10]  
Walters SJ(2008)Publication guidelines for improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project Ann Intern Med 149 670-1051