Composing a Core Set of Performance Indicators for Public Mental Health Care: A Modified Delphi Procedure

被引：0

作者：

Steve Lauriks

Matty A. S. de Wit

Marcel C. A. Buster

Onyebuchi A. Arah

Niek S. Klazinga

机构：

[1] Municipal Health Service Amsterdam (GGD Amsterdam),Department of Epidemiology, Documentation and Health Promotion (EDG)

[2] University of Amsterdam,Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre

[3] UCLA Fielding School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology

[4] UCLA Centre for Health Policy Research,Department of Epidemiology, Documentation and Health Promotion (EDG)

[5] Municipal Health Service Amsterdam (GGD Amsterdam),undefined

来源：

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research | 2014年 / 41卷

关键词：

Public health; Mental health services; Quality indicators; Health care; Consensus; Delphi technique;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Public mental health care (PMHC) systems are responsible for the wellbeing of vulnerable groups that cope with complex psychosocial problems. This article describes the development of a set of performance indicators that are feasible, meaningful, and useful to assess the quality of the PMHC system in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Performance indicators were selected from an international inventory and presented to stakeholders of the PMHC system in a modified Delphi procedure. Characteristics of indicators were judged individually, before consensus on a core set was reached during a plenary discussion. Involving stakeholders at early stages of development increases support for quality assessment.

引用

页码：625 / 635

页数：10

共 77 条

[1]

Addington D(2005)Performance measures for early psychosis treatment services Psychiatric Services 56 1570-1582

[2]

McKenzie E(2012)Why can’t mental health service be more like modern baseball? Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 39 1-2

[3]

Addington J(2001)Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness. Critical ingredients and impact on patients Disease Management and Health Outcomes 9 141-159

[4]

Patten S(2002)Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care Quality and Safety in Health Care 11 258-364

[5]

Smith H(2011)Care integration in the patient protection and affordable care act: Implications for behavioral health Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 50 1053-1058

[6]

Adair C(1999)Patient satisfaction and administrative measures as indicators of the quality of mental health care Psychiatric Services 20 502-508

[7]

Bickman L(2010)Critical time intervention: Model description and implications for the significance of timing in social work interventions Research on Social Work Practice 42 1246-1253

[8]

Bond GR(2004)Achieving consensus across diverse stakeholders on quality measures for mental healthcare Medical Care 11 35-336

[9]

Drake RE(2011)The development of the quality indicator for rehabilitative care (QuIRC): A measure of best practice for facilities for people with longer term mental health problems BMC Psychiatry 12 214-433

[10]

Mueser KT(2012)Performance indicators for public mental health care: A systematic international inventory BMC Public Health 86 328-329

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →