Hypothesenprüfung, Theorieentwicklung und Erkenntnisfortschritt in der Mathematikdidaktik Ein Plädoyer für Methodenpluralismus

被引：0
作者：
Wellenreuther M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Fachbereich Erziehungswissenschaften, Institut für Pädagogik, Universität Lüneburg, 21335 Lüneburg
来源：
Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik | 1997年 / 18卷 / 2-3期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1007/BF03338847
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The learning and understanding of mathematical concepts can be facilitated through detailed textual or oral explanation. Here explanation has two different meanings: Explanation as didactical explication of mathematical ideas or explanation as explication of conditions under which some people develope mathematical ideas. The main goal of mathematics instruction is two delineate explanations in such a way that students dont have to make additional inferences in producing a coherent text base. To construct such explanations the application of the theory of text comprehension of Kintsch is being applied to the verbalization of mathematical concepts. The core of real-science explanations are hypotheses. Empirical science has to test such hypotheses in prospective studies in a way that eliminates alternative explanations. After that the contribution of different research methods to scientific progress is discussed. Four different research methods were differentiated: (1) Diagnostic / descriptiv research of learning behavoirs, attitudes and strategies, (2) research of mathematics instruction (teaching and student behavior) (3) experimental research as prospective research and (4) developmental research. It is concluded that all four types of research have their own goals and it seems unfortunate to prefer one type at expense of others. © 1997 GDM - Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Mathematik.
引用
收藏
页码：186 / 216
页数：30
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Anderson J.R., Kognitive Psychologie, (1988)
  • [2] Beck C., Maier H., Das Interview in der mathematikdidaktischen Forschung, Jmd, 14, 2, pp. 147-179, (1993)
  • [3] Britton B.K., Gulgoz S., Using Kintsch's Computational Model to Improve Instructional Text: Effects of Repairing Inference Calls on Recall and Cognitive Structures, Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 3, pp. 329-345, (1991)
  • [4] Brophy J., Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Where Research Should Be Going, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 5, pp. 323-346, (1986)
  • [5] Brophy J., Where are the data? - A reply to Confrey, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 5, pp. 361-368, (1986)
  • [6] Brown J.S., van Lehn K., Repair Theory: A Generative Theory of Bugs in Procedural Skills, Cognitive Science, 4, pp. 379-426, (1980)
  • [7] Campbell D.T., Stanley J.C., Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research in Teaching, Handbook of Research in Teaching, (1963)
  • [8] Carpenter T.P., Learning to Add and Subtract: An Exercise in Problem Solving, Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving, pp. 17-40, (1985)
  • [9] Carpenter T.P., Moser J.M., The Acquisition of Addition and Subtraction Concepts in Grades One Through Three, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 3, pp. 179-202
  • [10] Carpenter T.P., Fennema E., Peterson P.L., Chi-Pang C., Loef M., Using knowledge of children's mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An Experimental study, American Educational Research Journal, 26, 4, pp. 499-531, (1989)
123456