Pain experience during internal spermatic vein embolization for varicocele: comparison of two cyanoacrylate glues

被引:0
作者
Sam Heye
Geert Maleux
Guido Wilms
机构
[1] University Hospital Gasthuisberg,Department of Radiology
来源
European Radiology | 2006年 / 16卷
关键词
Varicocele; Therapeutic embolization; Enbucrilate; Pain;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate possible pain sensation differences in patients after retrograde varicocele embolization either with n-butyl-(2)-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) or with n-butyl-(2)-cyanoacrylate + methacryloxysulfolane (NBCA-MS). Transcatheter varicocele embolization was performed in 64 consecutive patients (62 left, two bilateral). Embolization was done with NBCA (n=32) or NBCA-MS (n=32). Immediately after the procedure, patients were asked to evaluate pain during embolization using a visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was done with Student’s t test. Mean pain score on VAS was 3.23 (range: 0–8) for NBCA and 3.28 (range 0–9) for NBCA-MS. This difference was not significant (P=0.932). Independently of the type of glue, no difference in pain sensation (P value 0.421) was found between patients younger than 18 (n=29) and patients older than 18 years of age (n=35) (younger than18, mean 3.52; older than 18, mean 3.05). No difference in mean pain experience level (P=0.323) was seen in 11 patients with vessel wall perforation (23.4%) during the procedure (3.89; range: 0–8.5) in comparison with those without perforation (mean pain sensation level: 3.13; range: 0–9). No difference in pain experience was found after transcatheter varicocele embolization either with NBCA or NBCA-MS. Age and vessel wall perforation have no influence on pain sensation independently of the type of glue.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 136
页数:4
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Tay KH(2002)Selective spermatic venography and varicocele embolization in men with circumaortic left renal veins J Vasc Interv Radiol 13 739-742
[2]  
Martin ML(1999)Varicocele: strategies in diagnosis and treatment Eur Radiol 9 536-545
[3]  
Mayer AL(1980)New techniques for embolization of the internal spermatic vein: intravenous tissue adhesive (author’s transl) RöFo 133 625-629
[4]  
Machan LS(1981)Non-surgical cure of varicocele by embolization with isobutyl-2-cyano-acrylate (author’s transl) Ann Radiol (Paris) 24 406-409
[5]  
Cornud F(2001)Cytotoxicity, blood compatibility and antimicrobial activity of two cyanoacrylate glues for surgical use Biomaterials 22 59-66
[6]  
Belin X(2001)The use of cyanoacrylate adhesives in peripheral embolization J Vasc Interv Radiol 12 907-913
[7]  
Amar E(2004)External pancreatic fistulas resistant to conventional endoscopic therapy: endoscopic closure with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Glubran 2) Endoscopy 36 738-742
[8]  
Delafontaine D(2003)Efficacy and low vascular toxicity of embolization with radical versus anionic polymerization of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA). An experimental study in the swine J Neuroradiol 30 95-102
[9]  
Helenon O(2003)Society of interventional radiology clinical practice guidelines J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 S199-S202
[10]  
Moreau JF(1995)The aberrantly fed varicocele: frequency, venographic appearance, and results of Transcatheter embolization Am J Roentgenol 164 649-657