Combination Therapy for Choroidal Neovascularisation

被引:0
作者
Albert J. Augustin
Indre Offermann
机构
[1] Klinikum Karlsruhe,Department of Ophthalmology
来源
Drugs & Aging | 2007年 / 24卷
关键词
Bevacizumab; Ranibizumab; Aflibercept; Verteporfin; Intravitreal Bevacizumab;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) often leads to severe vision loss and is becoming increasingly prevalent as the aging population grows. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of CNV, but CNV also affects younger people with pathological myopia, ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks and idiopathic disorders. The monotherapies available worldwide to treat patients with CNV have primarily been studied in CNV due to AMD, and all have their drawbacks. Combination therapy takes advantage of the strengths of each therapy and their different mechanisms of action to achieve good treatment outcomes with few repeated treatments. For example, combination (triple) therapy with verteporfin photodynamic therapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy and anti-inflammatory therapy addresses three main targets of CNV development: the CNV itself, VEGF expression (which promotes CNV growth) and inflammation (which exacerbates the disease process). Such triple therapy has been shown to result in sustained improved vision after only one treatment. Vision outcomes similar to those observed with ranibizumab, the most promising and rigorously proven anti-VEGF monotherapy, may be possible with combination therapy without the need for continued monthly intravitreal injections, which are required if sustained outcomes are to be achieved with ranibizumab. The goal of CNV therapy is improved vision outcomes after one course of treatment. Combination therapy may lead to this goal. Such treatment could also result in fewer safety issues (fewer treatments are required and the unknown effects of continued long-term treatment are avoided), lower cost to both the patient and the medical system and greater convenience for patients (fewer clinic visits). However, combination therapy is beset with several challenges: different therapies, doses, timing and treatment sequences are possible, and it is therefore difficult to conduct large, definitive clinical trials to determine which treatment regimen is safest and most effective. Large controlled studies are needed to more clearly define effective and safe combination regimens for CNV.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 990
页数:11
相关论文
共 190 条
  • [1] Delcourt C(2005)The three-year incidence of age-related macular degeneration: the ‘Pathologies Oculaires Liees a l’Age’ (POLA) prospective study Am J Ophthalmol 140 924-6
  • [2] Lacroux A(2005)14-year incidence, progression, and visual morbidity of age-related maculopathy: the Copenhagen City Eye Study Ophthalmology 112 787-98
  • [3] Carriere I(2006)The prevalence of age-related maculopathy (ARM) in an urban Norwegian population: the Oslo Macular study Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84 636-41
  • [4] Buch H(2006)Prevalence of age-related maculopathy in the adult population in China: the Beijing eye study Am J Ophthalmol 142 788-93
  • [5] Nielsen NV(2004)Five-year incidence of age-related maculopathy: the Visual Impairment Project Ophthalmology 111 1176-82
  • [6] Vinding T(2004)Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States Arch Ophthalmol 122 564-72
  • [7] Bjornsson OM(2007)Fifteen-year cumulative incidence of age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study Ophthalmology 114 253-62
  • [8] Syrdalen P(2004)Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino eye study Ophthalmology 111 1288-97
  • [9] Bird AC(2005)Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in a population-based sample of Hispanic people in Arizona: Proyecto VER Arch Ophthalmol 123 1575-80
  • [10] Li Y(2006)Prevalence of age-related maculopathy in older Europeans: the European Eye Study (EUREYE) Arch Ophthalmol 124 529-35