Economic growth target and environmental regulation intensity: evidence from 284 cities in China

被引:0
作者
Feiyang Li
Zhen Wang
Liangxiong Huang
机构
[1] Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry,School of Economics and Finance
[2] Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
[3] Guangdong Techno-economy Research and Development Center,undefined
[4] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
[5] South China University of Technology,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Economic growth target; Environmental regulation intensity; Government work report; Panel data; Endogenous; Heterogeneity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Management of economic growth targets is a universal measure employed by worldwide governments for macroeconomic regulation. This paper aims to empirically investigate the impact of economic growth targets set by governments of prefecture-level cities on the environmental regulation intensity. We extracted panel data on annual economic growth targets and environmental regulation indicators from the government work reports (2009–2016) of 284 China’s prefecture-level cities. The study concludes that an increase in economic growth target significantly weakens the intensity of environmental regulation. The conclusion still holds true after robustness tests, including changing measurement variables, regression samples, and conducting endogenous tests. The underlying reason for the inhibitory effect may be that in order to achieve economic growth targets, local governments prefer less stringent environmental regulations. They subsequently expand outputs in the short term by increasing the proportion of secondary industry in GDP, land transfer area, and fixed asset investment. Further research in this paper also finds that only cities with low economic development levels and low openness to the outside world experience the negative effect of a local government’s annual economic growth target on environmental regulation intensity.
引用
收藏
页码:10235 / 10249
页数:14
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Adeel-Farooq RM(2018)Green field investment and environmental performance: a case of selected nine developing countries of Asia Environ Prog Sustain Energy 37 1085-1092
[2]  
Bakar NAA(1995)Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits Q J Econ 3 769-798
[3]  
Raji JO(2004)Trade, environmental regulations and the World Trade Organization: new empirical evidence J World Trade 38 285-306
[4]  
Besley T(2020)The effects of three types of China’s official turnover on air quality: a regression discontinuity study Growth Chang 51 1081-1101
[5]  
Case A(2018)The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China J Environ Econ Manag 88 468-485
[6]  
Busse M(2001)Unit root tests for panel data J Int Money Financ 20 249-272
[7]  
Chen LQ(2013)Environmental regulations and Korean trades Environ Resour Econ 22 785-815
[8]  
Gao M(2001)Water pollution abatement by Chinese industry: cost estimates and policy implications Appl Econ 33 547-557
[9]  
Chen Z(1996)Compliance and enforcement: air pollution regulation in the U.S. steel industry J Environ Econ Manag 31 96-111
[10]  
Kahn ME(2016)The impact of environmental regulation on economic agglomeration——from the perspective of new economic geography Soft Sci 22 27-30