Elderly subset analysis of randomized phase III study comparing pemetrexed plus carboplatin with docetaxel plus carboplatin as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

被引:24
作者
Pereira J.R. [1 ]
Cheng R. [2 ]
Orlando M. [3 ]
Kim J.-H. [4 ]
Barraclough H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Instituto Brasileiro Cancerologia Toracica, Sao Paulo
[2] Eli Lilly and Company, Taipei
[3] Eli Lilly Interamerica, Buenos Aires
[4] Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Univ. Health System, Seoul
[5] Eli Lilly Australia, West Ryde, NSW 2114
关键词
Overall Survival; Docetaxel; Carboplatin; Febrile Neutropenia; Pemetrexed;
D O I
10.1007/s40268-013-0032-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Many physicians consider platinum-doublet chemotherapy inappropriate for elderly patients, regardless of their medical fitness. Objective: This was a retrospective subgroup analysis of data from a multicenter, randomized, phase III clinical trial evaluating pemetrexed + carboplatin versus docetaxel + carboplatin in elderly chemo-naive patients with advanced, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Data from elderly patients (aged ≥65 years and ≥70 years) were evaluated using the same statistical methods as those used in patients aged <70 years and qualified intent-to-treat (Q-ITT) populations. The primary objective of the clinical trial was comparison of pemetrexed + carboplatin with docetaxel + carboplatin in terms of survival without grade 3 or 4 toxicity in chemo-naive NSCLC patients. Results: The ≥65- and ≥70-year age groups had 68 and 37 patients, respectively. Among patients aged ≥65 years, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for survival without grade 3-4 toxicity (HR 0.40, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.70) favored pemetrexed + carboplatin; this was similar to the HRs in patients aged ≥70 years (HR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.20-0.92), patients aged <70 years (HR 0.44, 95 % CI 0.32-0.62), and the Q-ITT population (HR 0.45, 95 % CI 0.34-0.61). The median values for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were similar across all age-group subsets and the Q-ITT population. The HRs for OS and PFS were similar for all age-group subsets, except for the ≥70-year age group, which favored pemetrexed + carboplatin to a greater extent. The toxicity profile was similar across age groups, with the exception of diarrhea, mucosal inflammation, and grade 3-4 neutropenia and leukopenia, which were slightly more common in elderly patients in both treatment arms. Between-arm differences in the toxicity profiles for the ≥65-, ≥70- and <70-year age subgroups were similar to those in the Q-ITT population. There were no on-study deaths or unexpected toxicities. Conclusion: The benefits of pemetrexed + carboplatin were maintained, and toxicity was manageable in both elderly subgroups. The favorable risk-benefit profile of pemetrexed + carboplatin makes it an appropriate first-line treatment option for elderly patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. © 2013 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 296
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Langer C.J., Clinical evidence on the undertreatment of older and poor performance patients who have advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Is there a role for targeted therapy in these cohorts?, Clin Lung Cancer, 12, 5, pp. 272-279, (2011)
[2]  
Rodrigues-Pereira J., Kim J.H., Magallanes M., Et al., A randomized phase 3 trial comparing pemetrexed/carboplatin and docetaxel/carboplatin as first-line treatment for advanced, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer, J Thorac Oncol, 6, 11, pp. 1907-1914, (2011)
[3]  
Scagliotti G.V., Parikh P., Von Pawel J., Et al., Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer, J Clin Oncol, 26, 21, pp. 3543-3551, (2008)
[4]  
Li M., Zhang Q., Fu P., Et al., Pemetrexed plus platinum as the first-line treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, PLoS One, 7, 5, (2012)
[5]  
Ardizzoni A., Boni L., Tiseo M., Et al., Cisplatin- versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis, J Natl Cancer Inst, 99, 11, pp. 847-857, (2007)
[6]  
Jiang J., Liang X., Zhou X., Huang R., Chu Z., A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing carboplatin-based to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, Lung Cancer, 57, 3, pp. 348-358, (2007)
[7]  
Gridelli C., Maione P., Rossi A., Et al., Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the elderly, Lung Cancer, 66, 3, pp. 282-286, (2009)
[8]  
Langer C.J., Manola J., Bernardo P., Kugler J.W., Bonomi P., Cella D., Johnson D.H., Cisplatin-based therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Implications of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 5592, a randomized trial, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94, 3, pp. 173-181, (2002)
[9]  
Wingo P.A., Cardinez C.J., Landis S.H., Et al., Long-term trends in cancer mortality in the United States, 1930-1998 [published erratum appears in Cancer 2005 Jun 15
[10]  
103 (12):2658], Cancer, 15, 97 SUPPL. 12, pp. 3133-3275, (2003)