Social goods dilemmas in heterogeneous societies

被引:0
|
作者
Alex McAvoy
Benjamin Allen
Martin A. Nowak
机构
[1] Harvard University,Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology
[2] Emmanuel College,Department of Mathematics
[3] Harvard University,Department of Mathematics
来源
Nature Human Behaviour | 2020年 / 4卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prosocial behaviours are encountered in the donation game, the prisoner’s dilemma, relaxed social dilemmas and public goods games. Many studies assume that the population structure is homogeneous, meaning that all individuals have the same number of interaction partners or that the social good is of one particular type. Here, we explore general evolutionary dynamics for arbitrary spatial structures and social goods. We find that heterogeneous networks, in which some individuals have many more interaction partners than others, can enhance the evolution of prosocial behaviours. However, they often accumulate most of the benefits in the hands of a few highly connected individuals, while many others receive low or negative payoff. Surprisingly, selection can favour producers of social goods even if the total costs exceed the total benefits. In summary, heterogeneous structures have the ability to strongly promote the emergence of prosocial behaviours, but they also create the possibility of generating large inequality.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 831
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Registration and revalidation of cultural goods of intangible nature: management dilemmas
    Teixeira Coelho, Daniele Maia
    Zanirato, Silvia Helena
    PATRIMONIO E MEMORIA, 2016, 12 (01): : 142 - 157
  • [42] Cultural assimilation and segregation in heterogeneous societies
    Russo, Francesco Flaviano
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2024, 37 (03)
  • [43] Civil Societies and Democratization Assumptions, Dilemmas and the South African Experience
    Fioramonti, Lorenzo
    THEORIA, 2005, 52 (107): : 65 - 88
  • [44] Why Do Societies Ever Produce Common Goods for Health?
    Savedoff, William D.
    HEALTH SYSTEMS & REFORM, 2019, 5 (04) : 402 - 405
  • [45] Preferences for leadership in social dilemmas: Public good dilemmas versus common resource dilemmas
    van Dijk, E
    Wilke, H
    Wit, A
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 39 (02) : 170 - 176
  • [46] Social efficiency deficit deciphers social dilemmas
    Arefin, Md Rajib
    Kabir, K. M. Ariful
    Jusup, Marko
    Ito, Hiromu
    Tanimoto, Jun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [47] Social Projection Can Solve Social Dilemmas
    Krueger, Joachim I.
    DiDonato, Theresa E.
    Freestone, David
    PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2012, 23 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [48] Social efficiency deficit deciphers social dilemmas
    Md. Rajib Arefin
    K. M. Ariful Kabir
    Marko Jusup
    Hiromu Ito
    Jun Tanimoto
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [49] RECIPROCITY AND COOPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS
    KOMORITA, SS
    HILTY, JA
    PARKS, CD
    JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1991, 35 (03) : 494 - 518
  • [50] Market games as social dilemmas
    Barreda-Tarrazona, Ivan
    Garcia-Gallego, Aurora
    Georgantzis, Nikolaos
    Ziros, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2018, 155 : 435 - 444