Committed to STEM? Examining Factors that Predict Occupational Commitment among Asian and White Female Students Completing STEM U.S. Postsecondary Programs

被引:0
作者
Catherine Riegle-Crumb
Menglu Peng
Tatiane Russo-Tait
机构
[1] University of Texas at Austin,STEM Education and Department of Sociology
[2] University of Texas,Population Research Center
[3] University of Texas at Austin,STEM Education
来源
Sex Roles | 2020年 / 82卷
关键词
STEM; Occupations; Postsecondary; Race; Affordances; Faculty; Peers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although it is well known that women have relatively high rates of attrition from STEM occupations in the United States, there is limited empirical research on the views and experiences of female STEM degree-earners that may underlie their commitment to their chosen fields. Utilizing survey data from 229 women completing STEM degrees at two U.S. universities, the present study examines how perceptions of occupational affordances and interactions with others in the field predict their occupational STEM commitment. Additionally, the study employs an intersectional lens to consider whether the patterns of association are different for Asian women and White women. Multivariate regression analyses reveal that although communal goal affordances do not significantly predict women’s occupational STEM commitment, agentic goal affordances are a strong predictor of such commitment. Regarding experiences with others in the field, results reveal that classmate interactions are not associated with STEM commitment, whereas positive faculty interactions do significantly predict such commitment. However, further analyses reveal racial differences in these patterns because agentic goal affordances are much weaker predictors of occupational STEM commitment for Asian women than for White women, and results indicate that faculty interactions are significant predictors of STEM commitment only for White women. Thus, our results strongly suggest that the theoretical models of motivation and support that underlie much of the discussion around women in STEM do not similarly apply to women from all racial backgrounds and that more research is needed that considers how both gender and race simultaneously shape STEM engagement and persistence.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 116
页数:14
相关论文
共 195 条
[21]  
Rubineau B(1994)Understanding women's educational and occupational choices Psychology of Women Quarterly 18 585-609
[22]  
Silbey S(2009)Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action Educational Psychologist 44 78-89
[23]  
Seron C(2015)Gendered socialization of STEM interests in the family International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 7 116-132
[24]  
Charette R(2007)Mean-centering does not alleviate collinearity problems in moderated multiple regression models Marketing Science 26 438-445
[25]  
Chen C(2012)Gender segregation in elite academic science Gender & Society 26 693-717
[26]  
Stevenson HW(2018)Do gender differences in perceived prototypical computer scientists and engineers contribute to gender gaps in computer science and engineering? Sex Roles 78 40-51
[27]  
Cheryan S(2016)Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering Journal of Vocational Behavior 92 79-93
[28]  
Cheryan S(2014)A replication attempt of stereotype susceptibility (Shih, Pittinsky, & Ambady, 1999): Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance Social Psychology 45 194-198
[29]  
Bodenhausen GV(2013)What’s so special about STEM? A comparison of women’s retention in STEM and professional occupations Social Forces 92 723-756
[30]  
Correll SJ(2012)Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102 700-717