Committed to STEM? Examining Factors that Predict Occupational Commitment among Asian and White Female Students Completing STEM U.S. Postsecondary Programs

被引:0
作者
Catherine Riegle-Crumb
Menglu Peng
Tatiane Russo-Tait
机构
[1] University of Texas at Austin,STEM Education and Department of Sociology
[2] University of Texas,Population Research Center
[3] University of Texas at Austin,STEM Education
来源
Sex Roles | 2020年 / 82卷
关键词
STEM; Occupations; Postsecondary; Race; Affordances; Faculty; Peers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although it is well known that women have relatively high rates of attrition from STEM occupations in the United States, there is limited empirical research on the views and experiences of female STEM degree-earners that may underlie their commitment to their chosen fields. Utilizing survey data from 229 women completing STEM degrees at two U.S. universities, the present study examines how perceptions of occupational affordances and interactions with others in the field predict their occupational STEM commitment. Additionally, the study employs an intersectional lens to consider whether the patterns of association are different for Asian women and White women. Multivariate regression analyses reveal that although communal goal affordances do not significantly predict women’s occupational STEM commitment, agentic goal affordances are a strong predictor of such commitment. Regarding experiences with others in the field, results reveal that classmate interactions are not associated with STEM commitment, whereas positive faculty interactions do significantly predict such commitment. However, further analyses reveal racial differences in these patterns because agentic goal affordances are much weaker predictors of occupational STEM commitment for Asian women than for White women, and results indicate that faculty interactions are significant predictors of STEM commitment only for White women. Thus, our results strongly suggest that the theoretical models of motivation and support that underlie much of the discussion around women in STEM do not similarly apply to women from all racial backgrounds and that more research is needed that considers how both gender and race simultaneously shape STEM engagement and persistence.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 116
页数:14
相关论文
共 195 条
[1]  
Abele AE(2007)Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 751-763
[2]  
Wojciszke B(2010)Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career Journal of Engineering Education 99 81-92
[3]  
Amelink CT(2005)Thinking about women: A quarter century’s view Gender & Society 19 437-455
[4]  
Creamer EG(1993)Gender and attitudinal commitment to organizations: A meta-analysis Journal of Business Research 26 63-73
[5]  
Andersen ML(2012)Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors Social Psychology of Education 15 427-448
[6]  
Aven FF(2005)Do faculty serve as role models? Impact of instructor gender on female students American Economic Review 95 152-157
[7]  
Parker B(2015)From bench to bedside: A communal utility value intervention to enhance students’ biomedical science motivation Journal of Educational Psychology 107 1116-1135
[8]  
McEvoy GM(2003)The intersection of gender and race in the labor market Annual Review of Sociology 29 487-513
[9]  
Beasley MA(2011)Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering American Sociological Review 76 641-666
[10]  
Fischer MJ(2013)The STEM crisis is a myth IEEE Spectrum 50 44-59