Penile prosthesis surgery for the fibrotic penis

被引:0
|
作者
Shaeer O. [1 ]
Shaeer K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokki, Giza
关键词
Tunica Albuginea; Bovine Pericardium; Penile Prosthesis; Urethral Injury; Penile Length;
D O I
10.1007/s11930-008-0032-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Penile fibrosis renders implantation of a penile prosthesis a formidable procedure. Fibrosed corporate cavernosa resist dilation by blunt dilators, mandating the use of force and resulting in a high percentage of complications. This is a report on advances in the field of penile prosthesis surgery for the fibrotic penis through the years 2006 to 2008. In that time, bovine pericardium was added to the choices of graft materials used to expand the corpora to accommodate the implant alongside the fibrous tissue. Also, the technique for open excavation of fibrous tissue through extended corporotomies was further evaluated in a series of nine cases. Downsized prostheses that were previously implanted in cases of penile fibrosis were replaced by regular-sized ones after having served as tissue expanders. Finally, minimally invasive, visually guided, sharp excavation of fibrous tissue has evolved through three stages, combining endoscopy and ultrasonography to safely excavate corporeal fibrous tissue. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 183
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthesis Surgery in Organ Transplant Recipients
    Dick, Brian
    Greenberg, Jacob W.
    Polchert, Michael
    Natale, Caleb
    Hellstrom, Wayne J. G.
    Raheem, Omer A.
    SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (04) : 636 - 640
  • [32] Efficacy and patient satisfaction associated with penile prosthesis revision surgery
    Kava, Bruce R.
    Yang, Yulong
    Soloway, Cynthia T.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (02) : 509 - 518
  • [33] Penile prosthesis surgery: A review of prosthetic devices and associated complications
    Sadeghi-Nejad, Hossein
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (02) : 296 - 309
  • [34] Phalloplasty and penile implant surgery
    Jorge R. Caso
    Michael D. Myers
    Lucas Wiegand
    Alejandro Rodriguez
    Shan Hann
    Rafael Carrion
    Current Urology Reports, 2009, 10 (6) : 475 - 477
  • [35] GANGRENE OF THE PENIS AFTER IMPLANTATION OF PENILE PROSTHESIS - CASE-REPORTS, TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    BEJANY, DE
    PERITO, PE
    LUSTGARTEN, M
    RHAMY, RK
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (01) : 190 - 191
  • [36] Current status of penile prosthesis implantation
    Montague D.K.
    Angermeier K.W.
    Current Urology Reports, 2000, 1 (4) : 291 - 296
  • [37] Serial assessment of efficacy and satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery
    Mulhall, JP
    Ahmed, A
    Branch, J
    Parker, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) : 1429 - 1433
  • [38] Comparison of in-patient and out-patient penile prosthesis surgery
    Mulhall, JP
    Bloom, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2001, 13 (05) : 251 - 254
  • [39] Update on penile prosthesis
    Colson, M. H.
    Cuzin, B.
    Faix, A.
    Grellet, L.
    Huyghes, E.
    SEXOLOGIES, 2018, 27 (01) : 63 - 66
  • [40] Local Treatment of Penile Prosthesis Infection as Alternative to Immediate Salvage Surgery
    Lujan, Saturnino
    Rogel, Ramon
    Broseta, Enrique
    Boronat, Francisco
    Sexual Medicine, 2016, 4 (04): : E255 - E258