A new model for predicting the winner in tennis based on the eigenvector centrality

被引:0
作者
Alberto Arcagni
Vincenzo Candila
Rosanna Grassi
机构
[1] Sapienza University of Rome,MEMOTEF Department
[2] University of Milano-Bicocca,Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods
来源
Annals of Operations Research | 2023年 / 325卷
关键词
Network; Eigenvector centrality; Tennis; Forecasting;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of statistical tools for predicting the winner in tennis matches has enjoyed an increase in popularity over the last two decades and, currently, a variety of methods are available. In particular, paired comparison approaches make use of latent ability estimates or rating calculations to determine the probability that a player will win a match. In this paper, we extend this latter class of models by using network indicators for the predictions. We propose a measure based on eigenvector centrality. Unlike what happens for the standard paired comparisons class (where the rates or latent abilities only change at time t for those players involved in the matches at time t), the use of a centrality measure allows the ratings of the whole set of players to vary every time there is a new match. The resulting ratings are then used as a covariate in a simple logit model. Evaluating the proposed approach with respect to some popular competing specifications, we find that the centrality-based approach largely and consistently outperforms all the alternative models considered in terms of the prediction accuracy. Finally, the proposed method also achieves positive betting results.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 632
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Angelini G(2017)PARX model for football match predictions Journal of Forecasting 36 795-807
[2]  
De Angelis L(2022)Weighted Elo rating for tennis match predictions European Journal of Operational Research 297 120-132
[3]  
Angelini G(2018)Applying graphs and complex networks to football metric interpretation Human movement science 57 236-243
[4]  
Candila V(2017)An empirical Bayes model for time-varying paired comparisons ratings: Who is the greatest women’s tennis player? European Journal of Operational Research 258 328-333
[5]  
De Angelis L(2005)Combining player statistics to predict outcomes of tennis matches IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 16 113-120
[6]  
Arriaza-Ardiles E(1972)Technique for analyzing overlapping memberships Sociological Methodology 4 176-185
[7]  
Martín-González JM(2001)Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations Social Networks 23 191-201
[8]  
Zuniga M(1999)Are sports seedings good predictors? An evaluation International Journal of Forecasting 15 83-91
[9]  
Sánchez-Flores J(1950)Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability Monthly Weather Review 78 1-3
[10]  
De Saa Y(2020)Neural networks and betting strategies for tennis Risks 8 68-594