Coping with complexity: past, present and future

被引：0
作者：
Erik Hollnagel
机构：
[1] University of Southern Denmark,
[2] MINES ParisTech,undefined
来源：
Cognition, Technology & Work | 2012年 / 14卷
关键词：
Coping; Complexity; Intractability; Automation; Training; Control;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In 1981, a technical report was published with the somewhat enigmatic title ‘Coping with complexity.’ Its purpose was to discuss how computers could be used to assist process plant operators in coping with complex situations during plant disturbances. Today, coping with complexity is a problem not only for process plant operators but for everyone. And while computers in 1981 were looked upon as the solution, they are now seen as the source of the problem. This paper discusses why and how the meaning of ‘coping with complexity’ has changed over the years and speculate on what may lie ahead.
引用
收藏
页码：199 / 205
页数：6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Bainbridge L(1983)Ironies of automation Automatica 19 775-779
  • [2] Dekker SWA(2004)Human factors and folk models Cogn Technol Work 6 79-86
  • [3] Hollnagel E(2002)MABA–MABA or abracadabra? Progress on human-automation co-ordination. Cognition Cogn Technol Work 4 240-244
  • [4] Dekker SWA(1983)Cognitive systems engineering: new wine in new bottles Intern J Man Mach Stud 18 583-600
  • [5] Woods DD(1960)Information input overload and psychopathology Am J Psychiatry 116 695-704
  • [6] Hollnagel E(1951)On the parallel between learning and evolution Behaviour 3 175-215
  • [7] Woods DD(1959)The limitations of a ‘Procrustean’ approach to the optimization of man-machine systems Ergonomics 2 187-194
  • [8] Miller JG(1990)The ecology of human-machine systems II: mediating “direct perception” in complex work domains Ecol Psychol 2 207-249
  • [9] Pringle JWS(2010)Capturing the dynamics of attention control from individual to distributed systems: the shape of models to come Theor Issues Ergonomics Sci 11 7-28
  • [10] Taylor FV(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
12