A phase I trial of cabozantinib and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer

被引:0
|
作者
David B. Zhen
Kent A. Griffith
Joshua M. Ruch
Kevin Camphausen
Jason E. Savage
Edward J. Kim
Vaibhav Sahai
Diane M. Simeone
Mark M. Zalupski
机构
[1] University of Michigan,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
[2] University of Michigan,Department of Biostatistics
[3] National Cancer Institute,Radiation Oncology Branch
[4] National Institutes of Health,Department of Surgery
[5] University of Michigan,undefined
来源
Investigational New Drugs | 2016年 / 34卷
关键词
Cabozantinib; XL-184; Gemcitabine; Pancreatic cancer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cabozantinib and gemcitabine improve tumor control in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in preclinical models through c-Met inhibition. We sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination in patients with advanced PDAC. Methods Patients with ≤1 prior treatment and adequate performance status were eligible. Cabozantinib was given orally once daily, beginning day (−)7 and continued with gemcitabine given intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Dose level was assigned using Time to Event Continual Reassessment Method (TITE-CRM). Primary endpoint was MTD, defined as the highest dose level at which ≤25 % of patients incurred a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary endpoints included response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and urinary biomarker assessment. Results Twelve patients were enrolled and treated with 10 patients evaluable for DLT. The probability of DLT was >25 % for all dose levels tested, and thus an MTD was not determined. DLTs included grade 3 ALT/AST elevations and thrombocytopenia. Three patients had partial responses, but each discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Median PFS and OS were 4.7 (95 % CI: 1.4–9.7) and 10.1 months (95 % CI: 3.6–20.6). Exploratory biomarker analysis showed correlation of c-Met and VEGF levels with response. Conclusions An MTD for the combination was not established. Cabozantinib and gemcitabine appear impractical for further development due to DLT at low doses and continuing toxicities with ongoing therapy. Acknowledging the small sample size, responses were seen suggesting further investigation of c-Met inhibition in PDAC may be warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 739
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A phase I trial of gemcitabine, S-1 and LV combination (GSL) therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer
    Yousuke Nakai
    Hiroyuki Isayama
    Kei Saito
    Takashi Sasaki
    Naminatsu Takahara
    Tsuyoshi Hamada
    Suguru Mizuno
    Koji Miyabayashi
    Keisuke Yamamoto
    Dai Mohri
    Hirofumi Kogure
    Natsuyo Yamamoto
    Kenji Hirano
    Hideaki Ijichi
    Keisuke Tateishi
    Minoru Tada
    Kazuhiko Koike
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2014, 74 : 911 - 915
  • [42] Phase I study of treatment with Gemcitabine and Docetaxel weekly in advanced pancreatic cancer
    Ridwelski, K
    Lueck, A
    Fahlke, J
    Lippert, H
    17TH INTERNATIONAL CANCER CONGRESS, VOL 1 AND 2, 1998, : 1025 - 1028
  • [43] A phase I/II multicentric trial of gemcitabine and epirubicin in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma
    Eickhoff, A.
    Martin, W.
    Hartmann, D.
    Eickhoff, J. C.
    Moehler, M.
    Galle, P. R.
    Riemann, J. F.
    Jakobs, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 94 (11) : 1572 - 1574
  • [44] Combining capecitabine and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A phase I/II trial
    Hess, V
    Salzberg, M
    Borner, M
    Morant, R
    Roth, AD
    Ludwig, C
    Herrmann, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (01) : 66 - 68
  • [45] Phase I trial of gemcitabine combined with radiation for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Wolff, RA
    Evans, DB
    Gravel, DM
    Lenzi, R
    Pisters, PWT
    Lee, JE
    Janjan, NA
    Charnsangavej, C
    Abbruzzese, JL
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2001, 7 (08) : 2246 - 2253
  • [46] A phase I/II multicentric trial of gemcitabine and epirubicin in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma
    A Eickhoff
    W Martin
    D Hartmann
    J C Eickhoff
    M Möhler
    P R Galle
    J F Riemann
    R Jakobs
    British Journal of Cancer, 2006, 94 : 1572 - 1574
  • [47] Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer
    Van Cutsem, E
    de Velde, HV
    Karasek, P
    Oettle, H
    Vervenne, WL
    Szawlowski, A
    Schoffski, P
    Post, S
    Verslype, C
    Neumann, H
    Safran, H
    Humblet, Y
    Ruixo, JP
    Ma, Y
    Von Hoff, D
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (08) : 1430 - 1438
  • [48] Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer
    Heinemann, Volker
    Quietzsch, Detlef
    Gieseler, Frank
    Gonnermann, Michael
    Schoenekaes, Herbert
    Rost, Andreas
    Neuhaus, Horst
    Haag, Caroline
    Clemens, Michael
    Heinrich, Bernard
    Vehling-Kaiser, Ursula
    Fuchs, Martin
    Fleckenstein, Doris
    Gesierich, Wolfgang
    Uthgenannt, Dirk
    Einsele, Hermann
    Holstege, Axel
    Hinke, Axel
    Schalhorn, Andreas
    Wilkowski, Ralf
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (24) : 3946 - 3952
  • [49] Phase II trial of gemcitabine and S-1 for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Hunho Song
    Boram Han
    Choong Kee Park
    Jong Hyeok Kim
    Jang Yong Jeon
    In-Gyu Kim
    Hyo Jung Kim
    Joo Young Jung
    Jung Han Kim
    Jung Hye Kwon
    Geundoo Jang
    Ho Young Kim
    Hyeong Su Kim
    Dae Ro Choi
    Dae Young Zang
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2013, 72 : 845 - 852
  • [50] Phase II trial of gemcitabine and S-1 for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Song, Hunho
    Han, Boram
    Park, Choong Kee
    Kim, Jong Hyeok
    Jeon, Jang Yong
    Kim, In-Gyu
    Kim, Hyo Jung
    Jung, Joo Young
    Kim, Jung Han
    Kwon, Jung Hye
    Jang, Geundoo
    Kim, Ho Young
    Kim, Hyeong Su
    Choi, Dae Ro
    Zang, Dae Young
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 72 (04) : 845 - 852