Knowledge of future primary teachers for teaching mathematics: An international comparative study

被引：30

作者：

Sharon L. Senk

Maria Teresa Tatto

Mark Reckase

Glenn Rowley

Ray Peck

Kiril Bankov

机构：

[1] Michigan State University, East Lansing

[2] Australian Council for Educational Research, Camberwell

[3] University of Sofia, Sofia

来源：

ZDM | 2012年 / 44卷 / 3期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

Comparative education; Content knowledge; International; Mathematics; Pedagogical content knowledge; Primary teacher education;

D O I：

10.1007/s11858-012-0400-7

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This article reports the results of the Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDSM) that are related to prospective primary teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics. TEDS-M was conducted under the auspices of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement with additional support from the US. National Science Foundation and the participating countries. In 2008 more than 15,000 future primary teachers, enrolled in about 450 institutions that prepare future primary teachers, were surveyed. Two domains of knowledge for teaching mathematics were assessed using items that had been developed and validated in a cross-national field trial. Large differences in the structure of teacher preparation programs are reported. Differences in mathematical content knowledge (MCK) and mathematical pedagogical content knowledge (MPCK) were also observed both within and between programs and countries. Anchor points on the MCK and MPCK scales are used to describe qualitative characteristics of knowledge for teaching mathematics. © 2012 FIZ Karlsruhe.

引用

页码：307 / 324

页数：17

共 40 条

[1]

English language learners: Boosting academic achievement, 2, 1, (2004)

[2]

An S., Kulm G., Wu Z., The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school mathematics teachers in China and the U.S, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, pp. 145-172, (2004)

[3]

Ball D.L., Bass H., Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics, Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics, pp. 83-104, (2000)

[4]

Ball D.L., Hill H., Bass H., Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide?, American Educator, Fall, pp. 14-22, (2005)

[5]

Ball D.L., Lubienski S., Mewborn D., Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge, Handbook of research on teaching, (2001)

[6]

Baumert J., Kunter M., Blum W., Brunner M., Voss T., Jordan A., Et al., Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress, American Educational Research Journal, 47, 1, pp. 133-180, (2010)

[7]

Blomeke S., Felbrich A., Muller C., Kaiser G., Lehmann R., Effectiveness of teacher education: State of research, measurement issues and consequences for future studies, ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 5, pp. 719-734, (2008)

[8]

Blomeke S., Kaiser G., Lehmann R., Schmidt W.H., Introduction to the issue on empirical research on mathematics teachers and their education, ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 5, pp. 715-717, (2008)

[9]

Blomeke S., Suhl U., Kaiser G., Lehmann R., Teacher education effectiveness: Quality and equity of future primary teachers' mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge, Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 2, pp. 154-171, (2011)

[10]

Blomeke S., Suhl U., Kaiser G., Lehmann R., Dohrmann M., Family background, entry selectivity and opportunities to learn: What matters in primary teacher education? An international comparison of fifteen countries, Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1, pp. 44-55, (2011)

← 1 2 3 4 →